From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vdye@github.com, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] repack: handle --keep-pack, --max-pack-size for geometric repacks
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 15:01:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1653073280.git.me@ttaylorr.com> (raw)
This series fixes two issues that Victoria and I noticed while working on an
unrelated issue yesterday.
- The first patch comes from Victoria's earlier submission[1], and addresses
an issue where packs specified as kept via the `--keep-pack` option could
potentially be removed (without rewriting their objects) during a
`--geometric` repack.
The first patch is Victoria's alone, with some minor fixups applied from my
review in [2]. It's included in this series since it's related, and avoids
any conflicts when merging.
- The latter two patches are mine, and address an issue where specifying a
`--max-pack-size` value during a `--geometric` repack could result in object
loss because of a false positive in our "did we write a pack with this
name?" check (which can occur when the list of packs we wrote isn't sorted).
The first of these two patches demonstrates the issue (done in a separate
patch, since the scenario is quite involved), and the second patch fixes the
bug.
Thanks in advance for your review.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1235.git.1653064572170.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/YofJLv8+x5J7yPmf@nand.local/
Taylor Blau (2):
t7703: demonstrate object corruption with pack.packSizeLimit
builtin/repack.c: ensure that `names` is sorted
Victoria Dye (1):
repack: respect --keep-pack with geometric repack
builtin/repack.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++------
t/t7703-repack-geometric.sh | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.36.1.94.gb0d54bedca
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 19:01 Taylor Blau [this message]
2022-05-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] repack: respect --keep-pack with geometric repack Taylor Blau
2022-05-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7703: demonstrate object corruption with pack.packSizeLimit Taylor Blau
2022-05-20 19:42 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-20 23:22 ` Taylor Blau
2022-05-20 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] builtin/repack.c: ensure that `names` is sorted Taylor Blau
2022-05-20 19:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] repack: handle --keep-pack, --max-pack-size for geometric repacks Victoria Dye
2022-05-20 20:05 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-20 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1653073280.git.me@ttaylorr.com \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.