From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: phillip.wood123@gmail.com, linusa@google.com,
calvinwan@google.com, gitster@pobox.com, rsbecker@nexbridge.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:21:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1696889529.git.steadmon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0169ce6fb9ccafc089b74ae406db0d1a8ff8ac65.1688165272.git.steadmon@google.com>
In our current testing environment, we spend a significant amount of
effort crafting end-to-end tests for error conditions that could easily
be captured by unit tests (or we simply forgo some hard-to-setup and
rare error conditions). Unit tests additionally provide stability to the
codebase and can simplify debugging through isolation. Turning parts of
Git into libraries[1] gives us the ability to run unit tests on the
libraries and to write unit tests in C. Writing unit tests in pure C,
rather than with our current shell/test-tool helper setup, simplifies
test setup, simplifies passing data around (no shell-isms required), and
reduces testing runtime by not spawning a separate process for every
test invocation.
This series begins with a project document covering our goals for adding
unit tests and a discussion of alternative frameworks considered, as
well as the features used to evaluate them. A rendered preview of this
doc can be found at [2]. It also adds Phillip Wood's TAP implemenation
(with some slightly re-worked Makefile rules) and a sample strbuf unit
test. Finally, we modify the configs for GitHub and Cirrus CI to run the
unit tests. Sample runs showing successful CI runs can be found at [3],
[4], and [5].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAJoAoZ=Cig_kLocxKGax31sU7Xe4==BGzC__Bg2_pr7krNq6MA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/steadmon/git/blob/unit-tests-asciidoc/Documentation/technical/unit-tests.adoc
[3] https://github.com/steadmon/git/actions/runs/5884659246/job/15959781385#step:4:1803
[4] https://github.com/steadmon/git/actions/runs/5884659246/job/15959938401#step:5:186
[5] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6126304366428160 (unrelated tests failed,
but note that t-strbuf ran successfully)
In addition to reviewing the patches in this series, reviewers can help
this series progress by chiming in on these remaining TODOs:
- Figure out if we should split t-basic.c into multiple meta-tests, to
avoid merge conflicts and changes to expected text in
t0080-unit-test-output.sh.
- Figure out if we should de-duplicate assertions in t-strbuf.c at the
cost of making tests less self-contained and diagnostic output less
helpful.
- Figure out if we should collect unit tests statistics similar to the
"counts" files for shell tests
- Decide if it's OK to wait on sharding unit tests across "sliced" CI
instances
- Provide guidelines for writing new unit tests
Changes in v8:
- Flipped return values for TEST, TEST_TODO, and check_* macros &
functions. This makes it easier to reason about control flow for
patterns like:
if (check(some_condition)) { ... }
- Moved unit test binaries to t/unit-tests/bin to simplify .gitignore
patterns.
- Removed testing of some strbuf implementation details in t-strbuf.c
Josh Steadmon (2):
unit tests: Add a project plan document
ci: run unit tests in CI
Phillip Wood (1):
unit tests: add TAP unit test framework
.cirrus.yml | 2 +-
Documentation/Makefile | 1 +
Documentation/technical/unit-tests.txt | 220 +++++++++++++++++
Makefile | 28 ++-
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh | 2 +
ci/run-test-slice.sh | 5 +
t/Makefile | 15 +-
t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh | 58 +++++
t/unit-tests/.gitignore | 1 +
t/unit-tests/t-basic.c | 95 +++++++
t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c | 120 +++++++++
t/unit-tests/test-lib.c | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/unit-tests/test-lib.h | 143 +++++++++++
13 files changed, 1014 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/unit-tests.txt
create mode 100755 t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/.gitignore
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/t-basic.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
create mode 100644 t/unit-tests/test-lib.h
Range-diff against v7:
-: ---------- > 1: 81c5148a12 unit tests: Add a project plan document
1: 3cc98d4045 ! 2: 00d3c95a81 unit tests: add TAP unit test framework
@@ Commit message
check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
- if (check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf))
- return; /* avoid SIGSEV */
check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
}
@@ Commit message
checked by t0080-unit-test-output.sh. t-strbuf.c shows some example
unit tests for strbuf.c
- The unit tests can be built with "make unit-tests" (this works but the
- Makefile changes need some further work). Once they have been built they
- can be run manually (e.g t/unit-tests/t-strbuf) or with prove.
+ The unit tests will be built as part of the default "make all" target,
+ to avoid bitrot. If you wish to build just the unit tests, you can run
+ "make build-unit-tests". To run the tests, you can use "make unit-tests"
+ or run the test binaries directly, as in "./t/unit-tests/bin/t-strbuf".
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
@@ Makefile: TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS =
THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES =
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS =
+UNIT_TEST_DIR = t/unit-tests
++UNIT_TEST_BIN = $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/bin
# Having this variable in your environment would break pipelines because
# you cause "cd" to echo its destination to stdout. It can also take
@@ Makefile: THIRD_PARTY_SOURCES += compat/regex/%
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-basic
+UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS += t-strbuf
-+UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
++UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
+UNIT_TEST_OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
+UNIT_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o
+
@@ Makefile: $(FUZZ_PROGRAMS): all
fuzz-all: $(FUZZ_PROGRAMS)
+
-+$(UNIT_TEST_PROGS): $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%$X: $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o $(GITLIBS) GIT-LDFLAGS
++$(UNIT_TEST_BIN):
++ @mkdir -p $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)
++
++$(UNIT_TEST_PROGS): $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X: $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o $(GITLIBS) GIT-LDFLAGS $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)
+ $(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $(ALL_CFLAGS) -o $@ $(ALL_LDFLAGS) \
+ $(filter %.o,$^) $(filter %.a,$^) $(LIBS)
+
@@ t/Makefile: TPERF = $(sort $(wildcard perf/p[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
TINTEROP = $(sort $(wildcard interop/i[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
CHAINLINTTESTS = $(sort $(patsubst chainlint/%.test,%,$(wildcard chainlint/*.test)))
CHAINLINT = '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' chainlint.pl
-+UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/*)))
++UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out unit-tests/bin/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/bin/t-*)))
# `test-chainlint` (which is a dependency of `test-lint`, `test` and `prove`)
# checks all tests in all scripts via a single invocation, so tell individual
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
+test_expect_success 'TAP output from unit tests' '
+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+ ok 1 - passing test
-+ ok 2 - passing test and assertion return 0
++ ok 2 - passing test and assertion return 1
+ # check "1 == 2" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:76
+ # left: 1
+ # right: 2
+ not ok 3 - failing test
-+ ok 4 - failing test and assertion return -1
++ ok 4 - failing test and assertion return 0
+ not ok 5 - passing TEST_TODO() # TODO
-+ ok 6 - passing TEST_TODO() returns 0
++ ok 6 - passing TEST_TODO() returns 1
+ # todo check ${SQ}check(x)${SQ} succeeded at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:25
+ not ok 7 - failing TEST_TODO()
-+ ok 8 - failing TEST_TODO() returns -1
++ ok 8 - failing TEST_TODO() returns 0
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:30
+ # skipping test - missing prerequisite
+ # skipping check ${SQ}1${SQ} at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:32
+ ok 9 - test_skip() # SKIP
-+ ok 10 - skipped test returns 0
++ ok 10 - skipped test returns 1
+ # skipping test - missing prerequisite
+ ok 11 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() # SKIP
-+ ok 12 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 0
++ ok 12 - test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 1
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:48
+ not ok 13 - TEST_TODO() after failing check
-+ ok 14 - TEST_TODO() after failing check returns -1
++ ok 14 - TEST_TODO() after failing check returns 0
+ # check "0" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:56
+ not ok 15 - failing check after TEST_TODO()
-+ ok 16 - failing check after TEST_TODO() returns -1
++ ok 16 - failing check after TEST_TODO() returns 0
+ # check "!strcmp("\thello\\\\", "there\"\n")" failed at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:61
+ # left: "\011hello\\\\"
+ # right: "there\"\012"
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
+ not ok 17 - messages from failing string and char comparison
+ # BUG: test has no checks at t/unit-tests/t-basic.c:91
+ not ok 18 - test with no checks
-+ ok 19 - test with no checks returns -1
++ ok 19 - test with no checks returns 0
+ 1..19
+ EOF
+
-+ ! "$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/t/unit-tests/t-basic >actual &&
++ ! "$GIT_BUILD_DIR"/t/unit-tests/bin/t-basic >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
@@ t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh (new)
## t/unit-tests/.gitignore (new) ##
@@
-+/t-basic
-+/t-strbuf
++/bin
## t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new) ##
@@
@@ t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new)
+static int do_skip(void)
+{
+ test_skip("missing prerequisite");
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+}
+
+static void t_skip_todo(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/t-basic.c (new)
+int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+ test_res = TEST(check_res = check_int(1, ==, 1), "passing test");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "passing test and assertion return 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "passing test and assertion return 1");
+ test_res = TEST(check_res = check_int(1, ==, 2), "failing test");
-+ TEST(t_res(-1), "failing test and assertion return -1");
++ TEST(t_res(0), "failing test and assertion return 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo(0), "passing TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "passing TEST_TODO() returns 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "passing TEST_TODO() returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo(1), "failing TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(-1), "failing TEST_TODO() returns -1");
++ TEST(t_res(0), "failing TEST_TODO() returns 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_skip(), "test_skip()");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "skipped test returns 0");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 1), "skipped test returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_skip_todo(), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(t_res(0), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 0");
++ TEST(t_res(1), "test_skip() inside TEST_TODO() returns 1");
+ test_res = TEST(t_todo_after_fail(), "TEST_TODO() after failing check");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "TEST_TODO() after failing check returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "TEST_TODO() after failing check returns 0");
+ test_res = TEST(t_fail_after_todo(), "failing check after TEST_TODO()");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "failing check after TEST_TODO() returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "failing check after TEST_TODO() returns 0");
+ TEST(t_messages(), "messages from failing string and char comparison");
+ test_res = TEST(t_empty(), "test with no checks");
-+ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, -1), "test with no checks returns -1");
++ TEST(check_int(test_res, ==, 0), "test with no checks returns 0");
+
+ return test_done();
+}
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+#include "test-lib.h"
+#include "strbuf.h"
+
-+/* wrapper that supplies tests with an initialized strbuf */
++/* wrapper that supplies tests with an empty, initialized strbuf */
+static void setup(void (*f)(struct strbuf*, void*), void *data)
+{
+ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+ strbuf_release(&buf);
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
-+ check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf);
-+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
++}
++
++/* wrapper that supplies tests with a populated, initialized strbuf */
++static void setup_populated(void (*f)(struct strbuf*, void*), char *init_str, void *data)
++{
++ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
++
++ strbuf_addstr(&buf, init_str);
++ check_uint(buf.len, ==, strlen(init_str));
++ f(&buf, data);
++ strbuf_release(&buf);
++ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
++ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
++}
++
++static int assert_sane_strbuf(struct strbuf *buf)
++{
++ /* Initialized strbufs should always have a non-NULL buffer */
++ if (buf->buf == NULL)
++ return 0;
++ /* Buffers should always be NUL-terminated */
++ if (buf->buf[buf->len] != '\0')
++ return 0;
++ /*
++ * Freshly-initialized strbufs may not have a dynamically allocated
++ * buffer
++ */
++ if (buf->len == 0 && buf->alloc == 0)
++ return 1;
++ /* alloc must be at least one byte larger than len */
++ return buf->len + 1 <= buf->alloc;
+}
+
+static void t_static_init(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, ==, 0);
-+ if (check(buf.buf == strbuf_slopbuf))
-+ return; /* avoid de-referencing buf.buf */
+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
+}
+
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+ struct strbuf buf;
+
+ strbuf_init(&buf, 1024);
++ check(assert_sane_strbuf(&buf));
+ check_uint(buf.len, ==, 0);
+ check_uint(buf.alloc, >=, 1024);
+ check_char(buf.buf[0], ==, '\0');
@@ t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c (new)
+{
+ const char *p_ch = data;
+ const char ch = *p_ch;
++ size_t orig_alloc = buf->alloc;
++ size_t orig_len = buf->len;
+
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
+ strbuf_addch(buf, ch);
-+ if (check_uint(buf->len, ==, 1) ||
-+ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, 1))
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
++ if (!(check_uint(buf->len, ==, orig_len + 1) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >=, orig_alloc)))
+ return; /* avoid de-referencing buf->buf */
-+ check_char(buf->buf[0], ==, ch);
-+ check_char(buf->buf[1], ==, '\0');
++ check_char(buf->buf[buf->len - 1], ==, ch);
++ check_char(buf->buf[buf->len], ==, '\0');
+}
+
+static void t_addstr(struct strbuf *buf, void *data)
+{
+ const char *text = data;
+ size_t len = strlen(text);
++ size_t orig_alloc = buf->alloc;
++ size_t orig_len = buf->len;
+
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
+ strbuf_addstr(buf, text);
-+ if (check_uint(buf->len, ==, len) ||
-+ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, len) ||
-+ check_char(buf->buf[len], ==, '\0'))
++ if (!check(assert_sane_strbuf(buf)))
++ return;
++ if (!(check_uint(buf->len, ==, orig_len + len) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >=, orig_alloc) &&
++ check_uint(buf->alloc, >, orig_len + len) &&
++ check_char(buf->buf[orig_len + len], ==, '\0')))
+ return;
-+ check_str(buf->buf, text);
++ check_str(buf->buf + orig_len, text);
+}
+
+int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
-+ if (TEST(t_static_init(), "static initialization works"))
++ if (!TEST(t_static_init(), "static initialization works"))
+ test_skip_all("STRBUF_INIT is broken");
+ TEST(t_dynamic_init(), "dynamic initialization works");
+ TEST(setup(t_addch, "a"), "strbuf_addch adds char");
+ TEST(setup(t_addch, ""), "strbuf_addch adds NUL char");
++ TEST(setup_populated(t_addch, "initial value", "a"),
++ "strbuf_addch appends to initial value");
+ TEST(setup(t_addstr, "hello there"), "strbuf_addstr adds string");
++ TEST(setup_populated(t_addstr, "initial value", "hello there"),
++ "strbuf_addstr appends string to initial value");
+
+ return test_done();
+}
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ va_end(ap);
+ ctx.running = 0;
+ if (ctx.skip_all)
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+ putc('\n', stdout);
+ fflush(stdout);
+ ctx.failed |= ctx.result == RESULT_FAILURE;
+
-+ return -(ctx.result == RESULT_FAILURE);
++ return ctx.result != RESULT_FAILURE;
+}
+
+static void test_fail(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+
+ if (ctx.result == RESULT_SKIP) {
+ test_msg("skipping check '%s' at %s", check, location);
-+ return 0;
++ return 1;
+ } else if (!ctx.todo) {
+ if (ok) {
+ test_pass();
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ }
+ }
+
-+ return -!ok;
++ return !!ok;
+}
+
+void test__todo_begin(void)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+
+ ctx.todo = 0;
+ if (ctx.result == RESULT_SKIP)
-+ return 0;
-+ if (!res) {
++ return 1;
++ if (res) {
+ test_msg("todo check '%s' succeeded at %s", check, location);
+ test_fail();
+ } else {
+ test_todo();
+ }
+
-+ return -!res;
++ return !res;
+}
+
+int check_bool_loc(const char *loc, const char *check, int ok)
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ test_msg(" left: %"PRIdMAX, a);
+ test_msg(" right: %"PRIdMAX, b);
+ }
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ test_msg(" left: %"PRIuMAX, a);
+ test_msg(" right: %"PRIuMAX, b);
+ }
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+{
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ fflush(stderr);
+ print_char(" left", a);
+ print_char(" right", b);
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.c (new)
+ int ok = (!a && !b) || (a && b && !strcmp(a, b));
+ int ret = test_assert(loc, check, ok);
+
-+ if (ret) {
++ if (!ret) {
+ fflush(stderr);
+ print_str(" left", a);
+ print_str(" right", b);
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+#include "git-compat-util.h"
+
+/*
-+ * Run a test function, returns 0 if the test succeeds, -1 if it
++ * Run a test function, returns 1 if the test succeeds, 0 if it
+ * fails. If test_skip_all() has been called then the test will not be
+ * run. The description for each test should be unique. For example:
+ *
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+void test_msg(const char *format, ...);
+
+/*
-+ * Test checks are built around test_assert(). checks return 0 on
-+ * success, -1 on failure. If any check fails then the test will
++ * Test checks are built around test_assert(). checks return 1 on
++ * success, 0 on failure. If any check fails then the test will
+ * fail. To create a custom check define a function that wraps
+ * test_assert() and a macro to wrap that function. For example:
+ *
@@ t/unit-tests/test-lib.h (new)
+
+/*
+ * Wrap a check that is known to fail. If the check succeeds then the
-+ * test will fail. Returns 0 if the check fails, -1 if it
++ * test will fail. Returns 1 if the check fails, 0 if it
+ * succeeds. For example:
+ *
+ * TEST_TODO(check(0));
2: abf4dc41ac ! 3: aa1dfa4892 ci: run unit tests in CI
@@ ci/run-test-slice.sh: group "Run tests" make --quiet -C t T="$(cd t &&
+fi
+
check_unignored_build_artifacts
-
- ## t/Makefile ##
-@@ t/Makefile: TPERF = $(sort $(wildcard perf/p[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
- TINTEROP = $(sort $(wildcard interop/i[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh))
- CHAINLINTTESTS = $(sort $(patsubst chainlint/%.test,%,$(wildcard chainlint/*.test)))
- CHAINLINT = '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' chainlint.pl
--UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/*)))
-+UNIT_TESTS = $(sort $(filter-out %.h %.c %.o unit-tests/t-basic%,$(wildcard unit-tests/t-*)))
-
- # `test-chainlint` (which is a dependency of `test-lint`, `test` and `prove`)
- # checks all tests in all scripts via a single invocation, so tell individual
base-commit: a9e066fa63149291a55f383cfa113d8bdbdaa6b3
--
2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230517-unit-tests-v2-v2-0-8c1b50f75811@google.com>
2023-06-30 22:51 ` [PATCH v4] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-07-01 0:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-01 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-07 23:07 ` [PATCH v5] " Josh Steadmon
2023-08-14 13:29 ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-15 22:55 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 9:05 ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 0:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 18:34 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-16 23:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-08-18 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-22 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-24 13:57 ` phillip.wood123
2023-09-25 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-06 22:58 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 17:37 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-08-17 20:38 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Junio C Hamano
2023-08-24 20:11 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-09-13 18:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-09 22:21 ` Josh Steadmon [this message]
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-10-10 8:57 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-11 21:14 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-11 23:05 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-11-01 17:31 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-27 20:12 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-01 17:47 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-10-11 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 13:43 ` [PATCH v8 2.5/3] fixup! " Phillip Wood
2023-10-16 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-01 17:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-01 17:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-27 20:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] " Christian Couder
2023-11-01 22:54 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 22:21 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-10-09 23:50 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Junio C Hamano
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] CMake unit test fixups Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] fixup! cmake: also build unit tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] fixup! artifacts-tar: when including `.dll` files, don't forget the unit-tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] fixup! cmake: handle also unit tests Phillip Wood
2023-10-19 19:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] CMake unit test fixups Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 10:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan phillip.wood123
2023-11-01 23:09 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-10-27 20:26 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 " Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-11-03 21:54 ` Christian Couder
2023-11-09 17:51 ` Josh Steadmon
2023-11-01 23:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] Add unit test framework and project plan Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] unit tests: Add a project plan document Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] unit tests: add TAP unit test framework Josh Steadmon
2023-11-09 18:50 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] ci: run unit tests in CI Josh Steadmon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1696889529.git.steadmon@google.com \
--to=steadmon@google.com \
--cc=calvinwan@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=linusa@google.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.