From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] cache-tree: fix segfaults with invalid cache-trees
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 06:38:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1728275640.git.ps@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1726556195.git.ps@pks.im>
Hi,
this is the second version of my patch series that fixes segfaults when
the index has a corrupted cache-tree extension.
I completely forgot about this series, and it seems to have slipped the
radar, until I rediscovered some of the segfaults while doing the last
couple of leak fixes. So I decided to just resend it with Eric's comment
addressed, which boils down to a single clarification of one of the
commit messages.
Thanks!
Patrick
Patrick Steinhardt (3):
cache-tree: refactor verification to return error codes
cache-tree: detect mismatching number of index entries
unpack-trees: detect mismatching number of cache-tree/index entries
cache-tree.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
cache-tree.h | 2 +-
read-cache.c | 5 +-
t/t4058-diff-duplicates.sh | 19 ++++---
unpack-trees.c | 12 +++--
5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Range-diff against v1:
1: 413faa2b81 ! 1: df5a2d0dbc cache-tree: refactor verification to return error codes
@@ Commit message
Refactor the function to instead return error codes. This also ensures
that the function can be used e.g. by git-fsck(1) without the whole
- process dying.
+ process dying. Furthermore, this refactoring plugs some memory leaks
+ when returning early by creating a common exit path.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
2: 4bdcc43518 = 2: d63087c53c cache-tree: detect mismatching number of index entries
3: fbffeeb6f1 = 3: 5e578c1f41 unpack-trees: detect mismatching number of cache-tree/index entries
base-commit: 3969d78396e707c5a900dd5e15c365c54bef0283
--
2.47.0.rc0.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 7:13 [PATCH 0/3] cache-tree: fix segfaults with invalid cache-trees Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 7:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] cache-tree: refactor verification to return error codes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 17:05 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-09-18 5:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 7:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] cache-tree: detect mismatching number of index entries Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-19 1:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-24 6:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-17 7:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] unpack-trees: detect mismatching number of cache-tree/index entries Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-07 4:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-10-07 4:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cache-tree: refactor verification to return error codes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-07 4:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cache-tree: detect mismatching number of index entries Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-07 4:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] unpack-trees: detect mismatching number of cache-tree/index entries Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1728275640.git.ps@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.