From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH mptcp-next-next 0/3] mptcp: rx path refactor
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:45:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1732902181.git.pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
This is a batch of changes I had sitting in my local tree for a while.
Why another refactor you may ask? Two main resons:
- currently the mptcp RX path introduces quite a bit of 'exceptional'
accounting/locking processing WRT to plain TCP, adding up to the
implementation complexity in a misurable way
- the performance gap WRT plain TCP for single subflow connections is
quite measurable.
The present refactor addresses both the above items: most of the
additional complexity is dropped, and single stream performances
increase measurably - from 55Gbps to 71Gbps in my loopback test. As a
reference, plain TCP is around 84Gps on the same host.
The above comes to a price: the patch are invasive, even in subtle ways:
the chance of destabilizing the implementation is real (ence the
additional, intentional '-next' into the subj).
In any case keeping the patch hidden for longer was not going to do any
good, so here we are.
Paolo Abeni (3):
mptcp: consolidate subflow cleanup
mptcp: move the whole rx path under msk socket lock protection
mptcp: cleanup mem accounting.
net/mptcp/fastopen.c | 4 +-
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 202 +++++++++----------------------------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 6 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 33 +++----
4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 179 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-29 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 17:45 Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-11-29 17:45 ` [PATCH mptcp-next-next 1/3] mptcp: consolidate subflow cleanup Paolo Abeni
2024-11-29 17:45 ` [PATCH mptcp-next-next 2/3] mptcp: move the whole rx path under msk socket lock protection Paolo Abeni
2024-12-02 16:56 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-12-03 7:40 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-29 17:45 ` [PATCH mptcp-next-next 3/3] mptcp: cleanup mem accounting Paolo Abeni
2024-11-29 18:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next-next 0/3] mptcp: rx path refactor MPTCP CI
2024-12-02 8:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-12-02 16:56 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1732902181.git.pabeni@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.