From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Isolate iova_cookie to actual owners
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:31:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1740705776.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
Now, iommufd implements its own sw_msi function that does not touch the
domain->iova_cookie but domain->iommufd_hwpt, as a domain owner pointer.
Isolate the iova_cookie from iommufd by putting it into the union where
the iommufd_hwpt is located.
This requires a set of preparations for iommu core to know what module
owns the domain private data. Since there are only two implementations
of the sw_msi function pointer, take an easier approach by calling the
two implementations directly according to a new private_data_owner tag.
This is a clean-up series for the sw_msi Part-1 core series, prior to
the Part-2/3 series. It's on github:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_msi_cleanup-v2
Changelog
v2
* Drop sw_msi function pointer
* Add a new private_data_owner tag in iommu_domain
* Let iommu core call the two sw_msi implementations directly
v1
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1740600272.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
Thanks
Nicolin
Nicolin Chen (4):
iommu: Add private_data_owner to iommu_domain
iommufd: Move iommufd_sw_msi and related functions to driver.c
iommu: Drop sw_msi from iommu_domain
iommu: Turn iova_cookie to dma-iommu private pointer
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h | 9 ++
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 5 +-
include/linux/iommu.h | 24 ++---
include/linux/iommufd.h | 9 ++
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 18 ++--
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 16 ++-
drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 122 -----------------------
drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c | 6 +-
9 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
base-commit: 598749522d4254afb33b8a6c1bea614a95896868
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 1:31 Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-02-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu: Add private_data_owner to iommu_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 3:13 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-28 3:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 3:29 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-28 16:29 ` Robin Murphy
2025-02-28 17:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iommufd: Move iommufd_sw_msi and related functions to driver.c Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 17:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 17:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 18:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 18:10 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu: Drop sw_msi from iommu_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-02-28 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Turn iova_cookie to dma-iommu private pointer Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1740705776.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.