From: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: "Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Abhinav Saxena" <xandfury@gmail.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1761511023.git.m@maowtm.org> (raw)
Hi,
This is the v3 of the "quiet flag" series, implementing the feature as
proposed in [1].
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1759686613.git.m@maowtm.org/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1757376311.git.m@maowtm.org/
Not much has changed in the actual functionality except various comment,
typing, asserts and general style fixes based on feedback. The major new
thing here is tests (a bit of KUnit squashed into the optional access
commit, a lot of selftests especially in fs_tests.c).
This series is still missing:
- Tests for scopes (ptrace, mounts, signals, abstract sockets)
- Some trivial edge cases (quiet_access > handled_access, setting quiet
when quiet_access == 0)
However it turns out the tests I've already finished has grown quite
large, and I expect many feedback on it. As such I thought I would send
this v3 now anyway, as there is probably already a lot to review. The
added fs_tests should exercise code path for optional and non-optional
access, renames, and mountpoint and disconnected directory handling. I
will add the above missing bits to v4.
New patches since v2:
- "selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with net rules"
- "selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with fs rules"
Removed:
- "Implement quiet for optional accesses"
(squashed into "landlock: Suppress logging when quiet flag is present")
Old feature summary below:
The quiet flag allows a sandboxer to suppress audit logs for uninteresting
denials. The flag can be set on objects and inherits downward in the
filesystem hierarchy. On a denial, the youngest denying layer's quiet
flag setting decides whether to audit. The motivation for this feature is
to reduce audit noise, and also prepare for a future supervisor feature
which will use this bit to suppress supervisor notifications.
This patch introduces a new quiet access mask in the ruleset_attr, which
gets eventually stored in the hierarchy. This allows the user to specify
which access should be affected by quiet bits. One can then, for example,
make it such that read accesses to certain files are not audited (but
still denied), but all writes are still audited, regardless of location.
The sandboxer is extended to show example usage of this feature,
supporting quieting filesystem, network and scope accesses.
Demo:
/# LL_FS_RO=/usr LL_FS_RW= LL_FORCE_LOG=1 LL_FS_QUIET=/dev:/tmp:/etc LL_FS_QUIET_ACCESS=r ./sandboxer bash
...
audit: type=1423 audit(1759680175.562:195): domain=15bb25f6b blockers=fs.write_file,fs.read_file path="/dev/tty" dev="devtmpfs" ino=11
^^^^^^^^
# note: because write is not quieted, we see the above line. blockers
# contains read as well since that's the originally requested access.
audit: type=1424 audit(1759680175.562:195): domain=15bb25f6b status=allocated mode=enforcing pid=616 uid=0 exe="/sandboxer" comm="sandboxer"
audit: type=1300 audit(1759680175.562:195): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffffffffffff9c a1=5565c86113d1 a2=802 a3=0 items=0 ppid=605 pid=616 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" key=(null)
audit: type=1327 audit(1759680175.562:195): proctitle="bash"
bash: cannot set terminal process group (605): Inappropriate ioctl for device
bash: no job control in this shell
bash: /etc/bash.bashrc: Permission denied
audit: type=1423 audit(1759680175.570:196): domain=15bb25f6b blockers=fs.read_file path="/.bash_history" dev="virtiofs" ino=36963
^^^^^^^^
# read outside /dev:/tmp:/etc - not quieted
audit: type=1300 audit(1759680175.570:196): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffffffffffff9c a1=5565c868e400 a2=0 a3=0 items=0 ppid=605 pid=616 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" key=(null)
audit: type=1327 audit(1759680175.570:196): proctitle="bash"
audit: type=1423 audit(1759680175.570:197): domain=15bb25f6b blockers=fs.read_file path="/.bash_history" dev="virtiofs" ino=36963
audit: type=1300 audit(1759680175.570:197): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffffffffffff9c a1=5565c868e400 a2=0 a3=0 items=0 ppid=605 pid=616 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" key=(null)
audit: type=1327 audit(1759680175.570:197): proctitle="bash"
bash-5.2# head /etc/passwd
head: cannot open '/etc/passwd' for reading: Permission denied
^^^^^^^^
# reads to /etc are quieted
bash-5.2# echo evil >> /etc/passwd
bash: /etc/passwd: Permission denied
audit: type=1423 audit(1759680227.030:198): domain=15bb25f6b blockers=fs.write_file path="/etc/passwd" dev="virtiofs" ino=790
^^^^^^^^
# writes are not quieted
audit: type=1300 audit(1759680227.030:198): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffffffffffff9c a1=5565c86ab030 a2=441 a3=1b6 items=0 ppid=605 pid=616 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" key=(null)
audit: type=1327 audit(1759680227.030:198): proctitle="bash"
Design:
- The user can set the quiet flag for a layer on any part of the fs
hierarchy (whether it allows any access on it or not), and the flag
inherits down (no support for "cancelling" the inheritance of the flag
in specific subdirectories).
- The youngest layer that denies a request gets to decide whether the
denial is audited or not. This means that a compromised binary, for
example, cannot "turn off" Landlock auditing when it tries to access
files, unless it denies access to the files itself. There is some
debate to be had on whether, if a parent layer sets the quiet flag, but
the request is denied by a deeper layer, whether Landlock should still
audit anyway (since the rule author of the child layer likely did not
expect the denial, so it would be good diagnostic). The current
approach is to ignore the quiet on the parent layer and audit anyway.
[1]: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/44#issuecomment-2876500918
Kind regards,
Tingmao
Tingmao Wang (8):
landlock: Add a place for flags to layer rules
landlock: Add API support and docs for the quiet flags
landlock: Suppress logging when quiet flag is present
landlock: Fix wrong type usage
samples/landlock: Add quiet flag support to sandboxer
selftests/landlock: Replace hard-coded 16 with a constant
selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with fs rules
selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with net rules
include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 64 +
samples/landlock/sandboxer.c | 133 +-
security/landlock/access.h | 5 +
security/landlock/audit.c | 257 +-
security/landlock/audit.h | 4 +-
security/landlock/domain.c | 33 +
security/landlock/domain.h | 10 +
security/landlock/fs.c | 144 +-
security/landlock/fs.h | 19 +-
security/landlock/net.c | 11 +-
security/landlock/net.h | 3 +-
security/landlock/ruleset.c | 17 +-
security/landlock/ruleset.h | 39 +-
security/landlock/syscalls.c | 72 +-
security/landlock/task.c | 12 +-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit_test.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 2238 ++++++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 121 +-
20 files changed, 3058 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
base-commit: 72fb0170ef1f45addf726319c52a0562b6913707
--
2.51.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-26 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 20:44 Tingmao Wang [this message]
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] landlock: Add a place for flags to layer rules Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] landlock: Add API support and docs for the quiet flags Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 21:01 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] landlock: Suppress logging when quiet flag is present Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] landlock: Fix wrong type usage Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] samples/landlock: Add quiet flag support to sandboxer Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] selftests/landlock: Replace hard-coded 16 with a constant Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with fs rules Tingmao Wang
2025-10-26 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] selftests/landlock: add tests for quiet flag with net rules Tingmao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1761511023.git.m@maowtm.org \
--to=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=xandfury@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.