From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: fix an on-stack path leak and migrate to auto-release for on-stack paths
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:20:19 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1764106678.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[CHANGELOG]
v2:
- Add back an early btrfs_release_path() call in
print_data_reloc_error()
This is to avoid holding the path (and its extent buffers locked)
during time consuming iterate_extent_inodes() calls.
And add a comment on that early release, with updated commit message.
I thought patch "btrfs: make sure extent and csum paths are always released in
scrub_raid56_parity_stripe()" has already taught us that tag based
manual cleanup is never reliable, now there is another similar bug in
print_data_reloc_error().
This time it is harder to expose, as we always imply if the function
returned an error, they should do the proper cleanup.
But extent_to_logical() does not follow that assumption.
The first patch is the minimal fix for backport, the second patch is
going to solve the problem by using auto-release for all on-stack btrfs
paths.
Qu Wenruo (2):
btrfs: fix a potential path leak in print_data_reloc_error()
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_RELEASE() helper
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 9 +++++++++
fs/btrfs/defrag.c | 5 +----
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 +++++--
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 18 ++++++------------
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 21:50 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-11-25 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: fix a potential path leak in print_data_reloc_error() Qu Wenruo
2025-11-25 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_RELEASE() helper Qu Wenruo
2025-11-26 14:27 ` David Sterba
2025-11-26 20:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-12-08 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: fix an on-stack path leak and migrate to auto-release for on-stack paths David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1764106678.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.