All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] selftests/mm: assorted fixes for hmm-tests
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 09:36:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1779090293.git.aboorvad@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi all,

This series fixes a few issues in hmm-tests that show up when
page-size and huge-page configuration differ from the hardcoded
assumptions the tests were written for (PMD/THP sizing, default
hugepage size, and related cases).

It also includes a fix to exclusive_cow: the test ignored the return
value of fork(), so both parent and child ran the same teardown path.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1777870179.git.aboorvad@linux.ibm.com/

Changes in v2:
- Patches 1 and 3 are unchanged.
- Patch 2: fall back to TWOMEG when read_pmd_pagesize() returns zero,
  use a fixed-size array to avoid non-constant initialisers, and skip
  benchmark sizes that exceed INT_MAX instead of capping the THP count
  at runtime.

Please let us know if you have any comments.

Thanks,
Aboorva

Aboorva Devarajan (1):
  selftests/mm: fix exclusive_cow test fork() handling

Sayali Patil (2):
  selftests/mm: allow PUD-level entries in compound testcase of hmm
    tests
  selftests/mm: remove hardcoded THP sizing assumptions in hmm tests

 tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19  4:06 Aboorva Devarajan [this message]
2026-05-19  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/mm: allow PUD-level entries in compound testcase of hmm tests Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-19  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/mm: remove hardcoded THP sizing assumptions in " Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-19  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/mm: fix exclusive_cow test fork() handling Aboorva Devarajan
2026-05-19 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] selftests/mm: assorted fixes for hmm-tests Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1779090293.git.aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.