From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 00/23] resctrl: MBA control emulation and ARM MPAM MB_NODE support
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:02:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1784217438.git.fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
This series enables MBA bandwidth control emulation on ARM MPAM when the
default MB control is disabled, using a node-scoped MB_NODE control as
the native backend. It extends memory-bandwidth monitoring and
control to memory-level MSCs or CPU-less NUMA nodes, and adds
documentation and tests.
Background
On x86, MBA bandwidth control is typically associated with the L3 cache:
schemata lines use L3 cache ids and monitor domains appear as mon_L3_XX.
On some ARM MPAM systems the MBA control is backed by a memory-level MSC
rather than the L3 cache MSC. A memory-level MSC is represented as a
NUMA node, and that node commonly has no CPUs of its own (a memory-only
node that still participates in bandwidth control). For such a resource
the control scope is NODE, schemata identifiers are NUMA node ids,
monitor domains are named mon_NODE_XX, and a node-scoped MB_NODE control
may be the only control with usable bandwidth hardware.
Because the memory-level MSC lives on a CPU-less NUMA node, the driver
must handle nodes with no local CPUs. mpam_ris_get_affinity() derives
affinity from the component's NUMA node id, so a memory-only node would
otherwise end up with an empty CPU mask and never be registered. When
the derived mask is empty, the driver falls back to cpu_possible_mask
(masked by MSC accessibility) so the node still gets a resctrl domain.
The borrowed affinity is kept out of class->affinity: those CPUs already
contribute through CPU-ful nodes in the class, and subtracting the
borrowed mask on teardown would remove CPUs that other live nodes still
depend on. Domain setup iterates all MSC components per CPU (keyed by
component), so each component — including these CPU-less memory nodes —
gets its own control and monitor domain.
Examples of NODE and emulation interfaces on MPAM.
**MB disabled, MB_NODE enabled** (``MB`` emulated by ``MB_NODE``)::
info/MB/resource_schemata/
├── mode # [legacy] native
└── MB/
├── scope # NODE
├── status # disabled
└── MB_NODE/
├── scope # NODE
└── status # enabled
schemata: MB_NODE and MB keeps same values
MB_NODE:0=100;1=100;2=100;10=100;18=100;26=100;34=100;35=100
MB:0=100;1=100;2=100;10=100;18=100;26=100;34=100;35=100
L3:1=ffff;2=ffff
mon_data/
mon_L3_01 mon_NODE_00 mon_NODE_02 mon_NODE_18 mon_NODE_34
mon_L3_02 mon_NODE_01 mon_NODE_10 mon_NODE_26 mon_NODE_35
mon_data/mon_L3_01/llc_occupancy
mon_data/mon_NODE_01/mbm_total_bytes
Switch to native by writing to "mode":
info/MB/resource_schemata/
├── mode # legacy [native]
├── MB/
│ └── scope # NODE
│ └── status # disabled
└── MB_NODE/ # MB_NODE is moved to here
├── scope # NODE
└── status # enabled
schemata: Only show MB_NODE. No "MB:" is emulated.
MB_NODE:0=100;1=100;2=100;10=100;18=100;26=100;34=100;35=100
L3:1=ffff;2=ffff
mon_data/
mon_L3_01 mon_NODE_00 mon_NODE_02 mon_NODE_18 mon_NODE_34
mon_L3_02 mon_NODE_01 mon_NODE_10 mon_NODE_26 mon_NODE_35
mon_data/mon_L3_01/llc_occupancy
mon_data/mon_NODE_01/mbm_total_bytes
**MB enabled, MB_NODE enabled**::
Same for legacy and native:
info/MB/resource_schemata/
├── mode # [legacy] native
├── MB/
│ ├── scope # L3
│ └── status # enabled
└── MB_NODE/
├── scope # NODE
└── status # enabled
schemata:
MB_NODE:0=100;1=100;2=100;10=100;18=100;26=100;34=100;35=100
MB:1=100;2=100
L3:1=ffff;2=ffff
mon_data/
mon_L3_01 mon_NODE_00 mon_NODE_02 mon_NODE_18 mon_NODE_34
mon_L3_02 mon_NODE_01 mon_NODE_10 mon_NODE_26 mon_NODE_35
mon_data/mon_L3_01/llc_occupancy
mon_data/mon_L3_01/mbm_total_bytes
mon_data/mon_NODE_01/mbm_total_bytes
The patches can be compiled but not tested on x86.
The 23 patches are grouped as follows:
1. Fixes for previous issues (patches 1–2)
Correct resource_schemata control subdirectory ownership on non-root
resctrl mounts, and fix a NULL address access in the ARM MPAM driver.
2. resctrl control emulation (patches 3–8)
Introduce the MBA emulation framework in the resctrl core: a writable
legacy/native mode under info/MB/resource_schemata/, per-control status
and nested schemata layout, schemata mirroring for controls without MBW
hardware, and subdir rebuild when the mode changes. Patch 8 documents
the user-visible behaviour in Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst.
This group and group 4 are trying to implement the concept in
discussion [1].
The main purpose of this group is to make CPU-less NUMA Node patches
work.
This implementation is only limited to MPAM CPU-less NUMA Node
emulation. It needs to be enhanced to make another other emulation
work, X86 memory region or RISC-V emulation etc.
It's totally fine for me to either replace this implementation with
another implementation or continue to enhance this implementition
for control emulations.
3. Memory bandwidth monitoring and control on memory-level MSCs
(patches 9–17)
Generalise the monitor infrastructure beyond hard-wired L3 paths:
de-hardcode L3 monitor plumbing, expose MBA MBM counter assignment,
name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id>, add a node-scope MBM
total event, and make MBM handling resource-aware.
On the ARM MPAM side, add memory-level MSC and ABMC support, refine
L3 topology and class selection, refactor domain setup to iterate all
MSC components per CPU (keyed by component), and handle CPU-less NUMA
memory nodes that have no local CPUs but still participate in MPAM
bandwidth control.
4. MB_NODE emulates MB (patch 18)
Wire MB_NODE as the native backend that emulates a disabled MB control
in the ARM MPAM driver.
5. Documentation (patches 19–21)
Document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes in the arm64 MPAM
guide (patch 19), NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE_* monitoring
in the resctrl documentation (patch 20), and an MB_NODE emulation
example on ARM MPAM (patch 21).
6. Tests (patches 22–23)
Add a KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity handling and a
kselftest that exercises MB emulation mode switching, resource_schemata
hierarchy, and schemata mirroring on ARM MPAM.
To apply the patches, on top of [2],
Testing
# KUnit (CPU-less affinity)
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run test_mpam_devices
# kselftest (MB emulation; requires ARM MPAM with disabled MB control)
cd tools/testing/selftests/resctrl
./resctrl_tests -a mb_emulation_test
The branch: https://github.com/fyu1/linux/ emul.cpu_less.rfc/
which is on top of [2].
[1] [RFC] mpam,x86,fs/resctrl: Generic schema description Proof of Concept
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cd96bda7-675d-451e-b6d9-9fe4a405edbe@intel.com/
[2] Reinette's resctrl control branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/reinette/linux.git branch resctrl/controls_rfc_v1
Fenghua Yu (23):
resctrl: Fix ownership of resource_schemata control subdirectories
arm_mpam: Fix NULL address access issue
resctrl: Expose MBA resource_schemata mode sysfs
resctrl: Expose per-control status in resource_schemata
resctrl: Add nested resource_schemata support for emulated controls
resctrl: Mirror schemata for controls without MBW hardware
resctrl: Rebuild resource_schemata subdirs on MBA mode change
Documentation: resctrl: document MBA control emulation
resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure
resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs
resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id>
resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event
resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware
arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class
arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection
arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup
arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes
arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control
Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes
Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring
Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM
arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity
selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM
Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst | 105 ++--
Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst | 184 ++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 2 +
drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 59 +-
drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 8 +
drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 488 ++++++++++++-----
drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c | 67 +++
fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 99 +++-
fs/resctrl/internal.h | 9 +-
fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 225 +++++---
fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 507 +++++++++++++++---
include/linux/resctrl.h | 62 ++-
include/linux/resctrl_types.h | 15 +-
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/config | 1 +
.../selftests/resctrl/mb_emulation_test.c | 460 ++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 1 +
.../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 1 +
17 files changed, 1942 insertions(+), 351 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mb_emulation_test.c
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 21:02 Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 01/23] resctrl: Fix ownership of resource_schemata control subdirectories Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 02/23] arm_mpam: Fix NULL address access issue Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 03/23] resctrl: Expose MBA resource_schemata mode sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-17 8:54 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 10:13 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 04/23] resctrl: Expose per-control status in resource_schemata Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 05/23] resctrl: Add nested resource_schemata support for emulated controls Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 06/23] resctrl: Mirror schemata for controls without MBW hardware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 07/23] resctrl: Rebuild resource_schemata subdirs on MBA mode change Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MBA control emulation Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 09/23] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 11/23] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id> Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 15/23] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection Fenghua Yu
2026-07-17 9:18 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1784217438.git.fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.