From: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>,
Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:24:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1790803471.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1789853192.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Hi all,
This small patch series fixes a bug reported by Eli Barzilay in the
interaction between autostashing, staged index entries, and
stash.index=true.
The first patch is an incidental cleanup, and the second re-arranges one
line to make the change easier. The third adds missing test coverage
(which catch breakages from prior incorrect rounds of this series). The
fourth fixes a test interaction with another in-flight topic. The last
holds the interesting bits.
Changes in v5:
• Rebase on synthetic merge for the test interaction with t5520
(dropping old 4/5) [59d1ce1b6e (Merge branch 'tb/t5520-reflog-expire'
into dk/stash-apply-index-incore, 2026-09-29)]
• Fix handling of tri-state merge_result.clean
Changes in v4:
• Drop merge verbosity changes altogether. I was going to
save-and-restore, but when looking at the index-merge test case (more
below) closer, I noticed that "git apply --cached" reports conflicts
on stderr. That is, "git stash apply --index" would report conflicts,
and silencing the merge takes that away. So instead let's leave the
configured verbosity alone.
• Only copy resulting index merge tree OID when successful
• Fix interaction with t5520 (new patch 4/5)
• Squash test from 3/5 into 5/5, since it requires actually merging
trees. I've elected to keep it a separate test for now (contrary to
Phillip's suggestion) since it's written and working. Adapting
existing tests requires quite a bit more digging into implicit context
assumptions ;)
Changes in v3:
• Change conflict label for current index
• Fix memory leak of merge_result
• Fix order of trees to make the correct merge (cherry-pick)
• New test (3/5) to validate this
• Fix test in 4/5 to assert more details of expected state
Changes in v2:
• Do give branch labels for the incore merge, although they are never
seen (and clarify commit message as a result, also keeping the
merge-ort asserts). Phillip was right: without those, we do segfault
on conflicts.
• Use the ui merge options to keep the same diff algorithm.
• Use merge_finalize instead of clear_merge_options, and reuse the
options between merge calls if they are already initialized.
• Add a new 2/4 to simplify merge options initialization.
• Add a new 3/4 with a test case for conflicted index merges.
v1: <cover.1789853192.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
v2: <cover.1790168285.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
v3: <cover.1790425008.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
v4: <cover.1790684309.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com>
[1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header
[2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier
[3/4] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index"
[4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core
builtin/stash.c | 94 +++++++++++++-----------------------------------
t/t3903-stash.sh | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
t/t7600-merge.sh | 9 +++++
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
Diff-intervalle contre v4 :
1: 6a165c4df4 = 1: d8f4c36459 builtin/stash: remove unused header
2: 35b64ae321 = 2: 8e99033ef0 stash: prepare merge options earlier
3: 7b0b317ce0 = 3: ee28d0a840 t3903: test failed "stash apply --index"
4: 2ac371d2dc < -: ---------- t5520: don't expire reflogs where it matters
5: e21b832a6e ! 4: ca3de1d4a3 builtin/stash: merge index in-core
@@ builtin/stash.c: static enum stash_apply_result do_apply_stash(const char *prefi
+ merge_incore_nonrecursive(&o, merge_base, head, merge,
+ &result);
+
-+ if (!result.clean) {
++ if (result.clean < 0) {
++ merge_finalize(&o, &result);
++ return error(_("index merge failed"));
++ } else if (!result.clean) {
+ merge_finalize(&o, &result);
return error(_("conflicts in index. "
"Try without --index."));
base-commit: a018953688f1b10bddf91bff8747068f5f4746a4
prerequisite-patch-id: 601853fa5478b0dbfb260ba02632418e90338219
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 21:26 [PATCH 0/2] Hi all, D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-21 15:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-21 13:17 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-22 12:43 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-22 12:51 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-22 13:57 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-22 20:34 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-19 21:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] Hi all, D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 9:42 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 13:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 15:45 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 9:53 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:07 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 9:42 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 12:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 15:58 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 16:16 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-24 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 4:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 13:00 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 9:51 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:04 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:04 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-25 16:17 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-25 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] t3903: test stash --index merges D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 15:44 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 15:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 9:41 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-27 18:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 12:02 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 9:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 12:03 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 15:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-27 19:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 9:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 12:05 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 12:33 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 13:00 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-28 13:45 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 14:50 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-28 15:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 11:38 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:54 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-28 15:40 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 " D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] t5520: don't expire reflogs where it matters D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:46 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-30 1:29 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] stash: clean up index-mode test merge Phillip Wood
2026-09-29 17:31 ` Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:26 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` D. Ben Knoble [this message]
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] builtin/stash: remove unused header D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] stash: prepare merge options earlier D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] t3903: test failed "stash apply --index" D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-30 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] builtin/stash: merge index in-core D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-01 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] stash: clean up index-mode test merge Phillip Wood
2026-10-01 17:47 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1790803471.git.ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--to=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=eli@barzilay.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.