From: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: joshwash@google.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:20:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019022824.189319-1-rnwolfe@google.com>
GQI receives a frame larger than one Rx buffer as a chain of mbufs, but
the driver doesn't report RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, and it chains
whether or not the application enabled it. 1/2 reports SCATTER for GQI
so an application that gates multi-segment receive on the capability,
such as VPP, can turn it on. 2/2 refuses an Rx queue setup or an MTU
change that would need scatter when the application hasn't enabled it.
Both patches change only the GQI queue format. DQO has a related
problem that this series leaves alone: its Rx path ignores
end_of_packet, so with Rx buffers smaller than the frame each buffer
is delivered as its own packet. DQO should either chain those buffers
or refuse that configuration too; that is left for a follow-up.
One more gap 2/2 doesn't close: the check reads dev->data->mtu, but gve
never pushes that value to the device. rte_eth_dev_configure() sets it
without calling mtu_set, so an application that never calls
rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() passes the check at 1500 while the device keeps
the MTU from its device descriptor, and on a jumbo VPC it can still get
chained frames. Applying dev->data->mtu at configure or start would fix
that but changes behavior and needs hardware to test, so it is left for
the same follow-up.
v2:
- add 2/2 to refuse MTUs that need scatter when it isn't enabled
(Stephen)
- correct the DQO statement in 1/2
Ryan Wolfe (2):
net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format
net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off
.mailmap | 1 +
doc/guides/nics/features/gve.ini | 1 +
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.h | 9 +++++++++
drivers/net/gve/gve_rx.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0.218.g1ec904b173-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` Ryan Wolfe [this message]
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1792439728.git.rnwolfe@google.com \
--to=rnwolfe@google.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.