From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Dickopp Subject: Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free? Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 19:57:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20040430055619.GD7487@archimedes.ucr.edu> <40923D1C.3090003@namesys.com> <20040430174343.GE7487@archimedes.ucr.edu> <409561EE.7030000@namesys.com> <20040502215500.GB18235@xieana.donarmstrong.com> <20040503065830.GS29226@nysv.org> <40967D41.705@namesys.com> <20040503172146.GV29226@nysv.org> <409682D0.10705@namesys.com> <20040503174910.GX29226@nysv.org> <20040503180042.GD5429@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <4097BE56.7010008@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4097BE56.7010008@namesys.com> (Hans Reiser's message of "Tue, 04 May 2004 09:01:26 -0700") Resent-Message-ID: <1fReaB.A.ThB.Pm9lAB@murphy> List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hans Reiser writes: > You miss the point. I get plenty of credit because of the filesystem > name. It is everybody else who gets shortchanged unless we print a > randomly chosen 1 paragraph credit at mkreiser4 time. I'm not a Debian developer. But I don't understand your earlier comment about attribution in science in the light of this comment. A typical attribution in a peer reviewed scientific journal looks like, e.g., "B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 121801 (2003)", where the "et al." represents 600+ people. Martin