From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Andreas Grapentin" <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
"Friedrich Welter" <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
"Gautam Gala" <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
"Hariharan Mari" <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Hendrik Brueckner" <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Joey Gouly" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
"Nico Boehr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Nina Schoetterl-Glausch" <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Zenghui Yu" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v9 00/24] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:46:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d03bc12e-be69-4c2e-bc5e-f587763e2594@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40dd808c-bddf-4a7a-be81-53c64de2707d@app.fastmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 1, 2026, at 15:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026, at 15:27, Steffen Eiden wrote:
>
>> I can send the two fixup patches as a reply here for this tomorrow or
>> later today if you want.
>
> My build bot is churning away looking for more corner cases.
> I initially had the wrong base, but with this one and the other
> two I sent, things are starting to look good. I'll keep it
> running over night, but if you don't hear from me for any additional
> build regressions in the next hour, it's probably fine.
No more build failures overnight, but after changing to gcc-10.5.0,
I get link failures for the namespaced module:
`__s390_indirect_jump_r1' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r1[__s390_indirect_jump_r1]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
`__s390_indirect_jump_r4' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r4[__s390_indirect_jump_r4]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
`__s390_indirect_jump_r14' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r14[__s390_indirect_jump_r14]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
`__s390_indirect_jump_r1' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r1[__s390_indirect_jump_r1]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
`__s390_indirect_jump_r4' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r4[__s390_indirect_jump_r4]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
`__s390_indirect_jump_r14' referenced in section `.text' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__s390_indirect_jump_r14[__s390_indirect_jump_r14]' of arch/s390/kvm/arm64/kvm-namespaced.o
See https://pastebin.com/raw/pJYu8UAb for the .config that triggered it.
Later compilers get CONFIG_EXPOLINE_EXTERN=y, which avoids the problem,
so an easy workaround would be to make the module depend on that symbol:
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION
config KVM
def_tristate y
prompt "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
+ depends on !EXPOLINE || EXPOLINE_EXTERN
select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
select KVM_ASYNC_PF
select KVM_ASYNC_PF_SYNC
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 17:34 [PATCH v9 00/24] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 01/24] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-10-06 15:19 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/24] KVM: Move architecture capability Kconfigs to header defines Steffen Eiden
2026-10-06 16:01 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-10-12 17:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 03/24] KVM: Replace CONFIG_KVM_MMIO with KVM_NO_MMIO Steffen Eiden
2026-10-06 16:18 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-10-12 17:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 04/24] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 05/24] arm64: ptrace: Use constants for compat register numbers Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 06/24] arm64: sysreg: Convert SPSR_ELx to automatic register generation Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 07/24] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 08/24] KVM: arm64: Use accessor functions for core regs Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 09/24] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 10/24] arm64: Share " Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 11/24] KVM: arm64: Share arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 12/24] s390/Kconfig: remove PCI dependency from HAS_IOMEM Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 13/24] KVM: s390: Use dedicated function for migration mode Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 14/24] s390/tools: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-10-01 10:25 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 15/24] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 16/24] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 17/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 18/24] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 19/24] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 20/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 21/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 22/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 23/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-10-01 12:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-01 13:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-01 14:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-01 15:30 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-10-02 10:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-01 14:03 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-10-01 14:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-30 17:34 ` [PATCH v9 24/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Integrate arm on s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-10-01 11:04 ` (subset) [PATCH v9 00/24] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Marc Zyngier
2026-10-01 13:27 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-10-01 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-02 8:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-10-01 15:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-02 8:00 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-10-02 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-02 9:17 ` Steffen Eiden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d03bc12e-be69-4c2e-bc5e-f587763e2594@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.