From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] staging: rtl8192e: oops occurs when finding hardware rtl8192se
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 23:19:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0642a21-4675-76f7-a470-b0dc1ef37cec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023040521-angelic-emptier-1367@gregkh>
On 4/5/23 16:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 05:00:13PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I use the hardware rtl8192se the driver
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192e_pci.ko detects that it should not
>> run on this hardware and aborts.
>> But when the driver is freeing the resources an oops occures. Find oops at
>> the end of this Email.
>>
>> When I comment out the following lines those errors disappear:
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ieee->hw_wakeup_wq);
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ieee->hw_sleep_wq);
>> cancel_work_sync(&ieee->ips_leave_wq);
>>
>> When I do an init before the cancel:
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&priv->rtllib->hw_wakeup_wq, (void *)rtl92e_hw_wakeup_wq);
>> The oops are gone as well.
>>
>> When I use cancel_delayed_work() instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync() it
>> also works.
>>
>> Can somebody give me a hint what the expected way is to solve this?
>
> Is this a new thing, or has it always been there?
I would need to check in several places.
It seems to me that it was an issue in kernel 4.0 already.
>
> Why is the driver loading if you don't have hardware for it? Or are you
> manually loading it?
Reason why they two drivers are loaded is that realtek managed to have
two different devices with the same vid and did.
from rtl8192se/sw.c:
static const struct pci_device_id rtl92se_pci_ids[] = {
{RTL_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REALTEK, 0x8192, rtl92se_hal_cfg)},
...
from rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
static struct pci_device_id rtl8192_pci_id_tbl[] = {
{RTL_PCI_DEVICE(0x10ec, 0x8192, rtl819xp_ops)},
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_REALTEK 0x10ec
The drivers are loaded both and find out with the pci revision_id if
they are in charge.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
May be I should mention that I do have an rtl8192se. But it does use a
different device id.
I am simulating the driver that it is rtl8192se hardware by changing the
revision_id.
Thanks for your response.
Bye Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-02 15:00 [BUG] staging: rtl8192e: oops occurs when finding hardware rtl8192se Philipp Hortmann
2023-04-05 14:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-05 21:19 ` Philipp Hortmann [this message]
2023-04-07 21:02 ` [BUG] staging: rtl8192e: W_DISABLE# does not work after stop/start Philipp Hortmann
2023-04-13 9:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-04-13 22:17 ` Philipp Hortmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0642a21-4675-76f7-a470-b0dc1ef37cec@gmail.com \
--to=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.