From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: reset forcewake count after reset Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:45:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1308870382-1587-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BF99E8EB for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1308870382-1587-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:06:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > index 0defd42..9292499 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > @@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ int i915_reset(struct drm_device *dev, u8 flags) > } else switch (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen) { > case 6: > ret = gen6_do_reset(dev, flags); > + atomic_set(&dev_priv->forcewake_count, 0); > break; > case 5: > ret = ironlake_do_reset(dev, flags); Can forcewake be non-zero here? If it has been bumped by a user wakelock, then what happens when that is subsequently released? I don't think this is safe... What scenario are you trying to fix? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre