All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spapr.c: set a 'kvm-type' default value instead of relying on NULL
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:32:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d142b41a-69c2-77de-861e-e68c3c0459b4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208153309.78825861@bahia.lan>



On 12/8/20 11:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Tue,  8 Dec 2020 10:45:36 -0300
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> spapr_kvm_type() is considering 'vm_type=NULL' as a valid input, where
>> the function returns 0. This is relying on the current QEMU machine
>> options handling logic, where the absence of the 'kvm-type' option
>> will be reflected as 'vm_type=NULL' in this function.
>>
>> This is not robust, and will break if QEMU options code decides to propagate
>> something else in the case mentioned above (e.g. an empty string instead
>> of NULL).
>>
>> Let's avoid this entirely by setting a non-NULL default value in case of
>> no user input for 'kvm-type'. spapr_kvm_type() was changed to handle 3 fixed
>> values of kvm-type: "HV", "PR" and, if no kvm-type was set by the user,
>> DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE. This allows us always be predictable regardless of any
>> enhancements/changes made in QEMU options mechanics.
>>
>> While we're at it, let's also document in 'kvm-type' description what
>> happens if the user does not set this option. This information is based
>> on how the pseries kernel handles the KVM_CREATE_VM ioctl(), where the
>> default value '0' makes the kernel choose an available KVM module to
>> use, giving precedence to kvm_hv. This logic is described in the kernel
>> source file arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c, function kvm_arch_init_vm().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> The case I mentioned in the second paragraph is happening when we try to
>> execute a pseries guest with '--enable-kvm' using Paolo's patch
>> "vl: make qemu_get_machine_opts static" [1]:
>>
>> $ sudo ./ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -nographic -nodefaults -machine pseries --enable-kvm
>> qemu-system-ppc64: Unknown kvm-type specified ''
>>
>> This happens due to the differences between how qemu_opt_get() and
>> object_property_get_str() works when there is no 'kvm-type' specified.
>> See [2] for more info about the issue found.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-12/msg00471.html
>> [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-12/msg01578.html
>>
>>
>>   hw/ppc/spapr.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index b7e0894019..32d938dc6a 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -3021,9 +3021,10 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
>>       qemu_cond_init(&spapr->fwnmi_machine_check_interlock_cond);
>>   }
>>   
>> +#define DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE "auto"
>>   static int spapr_kvm_type(MachineState *machine, const char *vm_type)
>>   {
>> -    if (!vm_type) {
>> +    if (!strcmp(vm_type, DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE)) {
>>           return 0;
>>       }
>>   
>> @@ -3131,6 +3132,16 @@ static char *spapr_get_kvm_type(Object *obj, Error **errp)
>>   {
>>       SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(obj);
>>   
>> +    /*
>> +     * In case the user didn't set 'kvm-type', return DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE
>> +     * instead of NULL. This allows us to be more predictable with what
>> +     * is expected to happen in spapr_kvm_type(), since we can stop relying
>> +     * on receiving a 'NULL' parameter as a valid input there.
>> +     */
> 
> Returning what is obviously a default value is straightforward enough
> that is doesn't need to a comment IMHO.
> 
>> +    if (!spapr->kvm_type) {
>> +        return g_strdup(DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE);
>> +    }
>> +
>>       return g_strdup(spapr->kvm_type);
> 
> Alternatively you could simply do:
> 
>      return g_strdup(spapr->kvm_type ? spapr->kvm_type : DEFAULT_KVM_TYPE);

Got it. I'll update it in v2.

> 
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -3273,7 +3284,11 @@ static void spapr_instance_init(Object *obj)
>>       object_property_add_str(obj, "kvm-type",
>>                               spapr_get_kvm_type, spapr_set_kvm_type);
>>       object_property_set_description(obj, "kvm-type",
>> -                                    "Specifies the KVM virtualization mode (HV, PR)");
>> +                                    "Specifies the KVM virtualization mode (HV, PR)."
> 
> Why not documenting "auto" as a valid option as well ?


This was my first idea but I got cold feet about it. I got afraid that
exposing the default 'auto' option might misled users into believing that
we're adding a new configuration option, even thought it's just the
same behavior users are dealing with for 7+ years. I chose to use the
'auto' value as an internal default that isn't documented . Granted, this
also means that we have now a hidden 'kvm-type=auto' setting, so yeah.

If there is a consensus that exposing the "auto" default is the right
thing to do in this case I'll just go ahead and expose it.



> 
> While here you could maybe convert HV and PR to lowercase in order to
> have a prettier "hv, pr, auto" set of valid values in the help string.
> You'd need to convert the related checks in spapr_kvm_type() to still
> check for the uppercase versions for compatibility, eg. by using
> g_ascii_strcasecmp().

Roger that.

> 
>> +                                    " If not specified, defaults to any available KVM"
>> +                                    " module loaded in the host. In case both kvm_hv"
>> +                                    " and kvm_pr are loaded, kvm_hv takes precedence.");
>> +
> 
> s/If not specified/If 'auto'/ and mention 'auto' as being the default value.


As I said above, I'll happily mention the 'auto' default if we can agree
that this will not lead to user confusion thinking this is a new option and
so on.


Thanks,


DHB

> 
>>       object_property_add_bool(obj, "modern-hotplug-events",
>>                               spapr_get_modern_hotplug_events,
>>                               spapr_set_modern_hotplug_events);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-08 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-08 13:45 [PATCH 1/1] spapr.c: set a 'kvm-type' default value instead of relying on NULL Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-12-08 14:33 ` Greg Kurz
2020-12-08 15:32   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2020-12-10  3:37     ` David Gibson
2020-12-10 12:34       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-10 12:47         ` Greg Kurz
2020-12-10 13:10           ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-12-10 13:49             ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d142b41a-69c2-77de-861e-e68c3c0459b4@gmail.com \
    --to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.