Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c.

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 22/10/2026 18:49, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 16/08/26 07:50, Philip Li wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 11:56:56AM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>>> On 14/08/26 17:42, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>
>>>> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>>>>
>>>> [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next]
>>>> [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes linus/master v7.2-rc7
>>> next-20260813]
>>>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>>>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>>
>>>> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Zigotzky/Connecting-the-SB600-s-i8259-controller-rather-in-pasemi-s-pci-c-than-in-pasemi-s-setup-c/20260813-054214
>>>>
>>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>
>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c:217:6: warning: no previous
>>> prototype for function 'nemo_init_IRQ' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>>>
>>> This is the old patch.
>> Sorry about this meaningless report, we will improve the bot to check
>> new patches to avoid such report.
>>
>>> Here is the new patch with pasemi.h: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20260801043458.12500-1-chzigotzky@xenosoft.de/
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> Hi All,
> 
> is it possible to add this patch to the kernel 7.4 too?

This patch received reports which basically rejected the patch for
inclusion and we wait for proper, fixed version, as explained in
submitting patches document.

Patch also did not follow standard naming rules of commits, so again,
please read the docs (submitting patches) how to properly describe and
send your contribution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof