Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] ALSA: seq: Don't lose partial read failure

[Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>]

On 10/8/2026 10:53 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:32:29 +0200,
> Cezary Rojewski wrote:

>>> --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
>>> +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
>>> @@ -480,11 +480,11 @@ static ssize_t snd_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>>>  	if (err < 0) {
>>>  		if (cell)
>>>  			snd_seq_fifo_cell_putback(fifo, cell);
>>> -		if (err == -EAGAIN && result > 0)
>>> -			err = 0;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	return (err < 0) ? err : result;
>>> +	if (result > 0)
>>> +		return result;
>>> +	return err < 0 ? err : 0;
>>
>> Can 'err' even be positive? Looks to me as if 'result' holds the bytes
>> and flat 'return err' suffices.
> 
> Yes, it's just to make sure.
It's not a blocker obviously, I'm just in favor of avoiding
double-protection. I'd rather fix the problem that causes 'err' to be
positive if somehow things turn that way.

Kind regards,
Czarek