From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B757CE00BAA; Mon, 7 May 2018 03:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.115 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CE5E00A4C for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 03:18:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2018 03:18:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,373,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="53793723" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2018 03:18:12 -0700 To: Mirza Krak References: <70e7860b-5b9f-45c7-5436-73859b0d3706@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 13:12:24 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto list discussion Subject: Re: ROOTFS_RPM_DEBUG undocumented X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 10:18:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/07/2018 12:03 PM, Mirza Krak wrote: > I have also been bitten by rpm performance issues in docker and glad > that I found this. I am in the process of verifying above (on pyro > branch). > > Is this patch on its way to pyro and rocko branches? As far as I know, no. You are welcome to backport and submit. Alex