From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12D703CB2F4
	for <syzbot@lists.linux.dev>; Fri, 15 May 2026 10:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1778841181; cv=none; b=TpfwhD3z+IvMIvDlBvl8ofRWFC0bgxrBCYD6fzNyGCdEiF5iGYLQnhjl4EJnVg29OY/otbf3KuVuxSSShFJCkEYw86+rjaCXdKii6zcX61ElkFmpnhZsCxhI09dFusLwOhfGiZad+GrJvBarcm3qUqqB6UPj3ntNUyf7mvP09/Y=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1778841181; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=Nh6a8qYnFn88AZeqeQSSVk7HQAQTtQNSzyFgkpVYa/M=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Date; b=O3SLhnxckqmrJnIu9zTWVNkIlMhfhP/yRgJ+bhfazFlbZ6BNwM5ElOliIHbRUBclHjCqTEgV5O/HwEaHg55b86cB1DBNe2FBRLgnGk2viXzdu+qzQXxs5E+C3l8kSwiwYPQFgENA3SzmuaYjFOHWxrmmMkwcbDa4rJED0kLcyDk=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=flC9CXBn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="flC9CXBn"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C075BC2BCB0;
	Fri, 15 May 2026 10:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1778841180;
	bh=Nh6a8qYnFn88AZeqeQSSVk7HQAQTtQNSzyFgkpVYa/M=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:From;
	b=flC9CXBnqOMPyKPOB/RgJF8HlTDXncRKSOzxcD+s0dvXsf9rNS2wIR3qFc9Ednn0m
	 3qRJbe/78Ja1f6LqekW6UgzgR1cpvF4rotB5FLvNjg/0fu5XDEwxeQGc8j4mmJXtkP
	 Nhsrn2AtSrKbn/Dy7bCj5zbUZ6g4yrMKs4Hwx5y5LOOm5xu9Bh8DFsMKmwylZPLc1Q
	 iGiYBifOMXJeThvJ48heGYsN96T6d8u4gP42F5Rs61tAgRFiJDUjrtpHz+Vkou21Vp
	 KkAn55C0NL7moqL7dxWO0L4HB37TOd29E/wN8DBRyUzyryFLU5eLnbAIyHS0y8v2ed
	 MOfko0fvE34mg==
From: "syzbot" <syzbot@kernel.org>
To: nogikh@google.com, syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com
Cc: syzbot@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] jfs: fix slab-use-after-free in lbmIODone
In-Reply-To: <CANp29Y4EZ-L0hzAybhcU=qS0vUNuejVMzZRzoQRyJQjdtWvE=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d2e21234-5532-48b1-b042-1fbe9efc7d30@mail.kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: syzbot@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <syzbot.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:syzbot+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:syzbot+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 10:33:00 +0000 (UTC)

> Did this bug really exist since linux 2.6?
Yes, the `wait_event(bp->l_ioevent, (bp->l_flag != lbmREAD));` logic in
`lbmRead()` has been present since the initial git commit (Linux
2.6.12-rc2), so the bug has likely existed since then.

-- 
This reply was generated by an AI model.
See  for more information.