From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amin Azez Subject: Patch lifetime Re: [PATCH] Fix NAT TCP sequence adjustment Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:33:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20050402202438.GA2968@linuxace.com> <4250435E.1090309@trash.net> <20050403235320.GB28850@linuxace.com> <20050404044033.GA1847@linuxace.com> <4250FA72.3020502@trash.net> <20050404204716.GA4067@linuxace.com> <42523F00.7010902@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <42523F00.7010902@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org I apologise for this dumb question, which really applies to most of the patches submitted here. I oberve that Phils' fine patch has undergone some peer review and is just about to be "accepted". What happens next? Does it hit pom-ng some short time later? When will it hit iptables cvs head and snapshots? When will it (will it ever) become part of the core kernel distribution? What I am really trying to find out is the best way to track such patches through their lifetime until I no longer need to. Amin