From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Test failures in u-boot/master on NVIDIA HW with recent push
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:20:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d358e4bc-94de-7cd8-b433-0bb56f2ae2da@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAh8qszFUv2NefaniDCTgXJOCpd1ekn8=czeH3Tc8-3wQ6r_jw@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/22/19 1:12 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 7:29 AM Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/17/19 6:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:50:27PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> On 1/17/19 5:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:34:57PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The recent set of patches pushed to u-boot/master cause DFU failures on both
>>>>>> Jetson TK1 and Jetson TX1 (i.e. all platforms where I run the DFU test) with
>>>>>> the following in the log:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> host:
>>>>>> dfu-util -a 0 -U /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/u-boot-denx_uboot-master-test-py/U_BOOT_BOARD/jetson-tk1/build/u-boot/jetson-tk1/dfu_readback.bin
>>>>>> -p 3-2.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> target:
>>>>>> ** Reading file would overwrite reserved memory **
>>>>>> dfu: Read error!
>>>>>> dfu_read: Failed to fill buffer
>>>>>> Tegra124 (Jetson TK1) #
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed some lmb fixes in the list, so I guess it's due to that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So.. intentional! Adding in Simon here, but I think the short answer is
>>>>> that you need to change where you're saying the file goes in memory.
>>>>> FWIW I run the DFU test on my dra7xx_evm and it's passing.
>>>>
>>>> You applied a change which intentionally broke functionality??? That sounds
>>>> pretty bad...
>>>
>>> So, yes. A design decision / feature of "don't check where we're
>>> loading payloads to" is also a security vulnerability to bypass secure
>>> boot. So we now have changes in that make a good attempt at keeping us
>>> from loading a payload that can in turn overwrite ourself. And I merged
>>> it super early in the merge window to try and catch the unintended
>>> consequences.
>>>
>>>> Looking at the precise test that failed, we don't actually specify where the
>>>> data goes in memory; it's written to the filesystem and all memmory
>>>> locations are internally allocated by U-Boot. So when you say "you need to
>>>> change where you're saying the file goes in memory", do you mean via the DFU
>>>> altinfo variable (which does not specify a memory location in this case, so
>>>> I can't), or by modifying some board-/SoC-specific config file or code to
>>>> specify where DFU buffers data (in which case, I'd argue that a
>>>> backwards-compatible default should have been put in place to prevent
>>>> breaking functionality)?
>>>>
>>>> The DFU altinfo values that are tested on both boards are:
>>>>
>>>> Fails:
>>>>
>>>> Device mmc 1 (which is an SD card):
>>>> "alt_info": "/dfu_test.bin ext4 1 1;/dfu_dummy.bin ext4 1 1",
>>
>> "test_sizes": (
>> 64 - 1,
>> 64,
>> 64 + 1,
>> 4096 - 1,
>> ),
>> },
>>
>>>> All pass:
>>>>
>>>> Device mmc 1 (which is an SD card):
>>>> "alt_info": "/dfu_test.bin part 1 3;/dfu_dummy.bin ext4 1 1",
>>
>> "test_sizes": (
>> 128 - 1,
>> 128,
>> 128 + 1,
>> 4096,
>> ),
>>
>>>> Device mmc 1 (which is an SD card):
>>>> "alt_info": "/dfu_test.bin raw 4196352 18432;/dfu_dummy.bin ext4 1 1",
>>
>> "test_sizes": (
>> 960 - 1,
>> 960,
>> 960 + 1,
>> 4096 + 1,
>> ),
>>
>>>> Device ram
>>>> "alt_info": "alt0 ram 80000000 01000000;alt1 ram 81000000 01000000",
>>
>> "test_sizes": (
>> 1024 * 1024 - 1,
>> 1024 * 1024,
>> 8 * 1024 * 1024,
>> ),
>>
>>> So that's interesting. How big is dfu_test.bin? Checking my config, I
>>> don't have SD card only RAM. If you do RAM only tests does it pass (as
>>> that might narrow down where maybe something is wrong) ?
>>
>> Yes, that RAM-only test passes. The tests are run in the order listed above.
>>
>> test_dfu.py iterates over a bunch of different file sizes; I listed them
>> below the DFU configs above.
>
> OK, I have absolutely no experience with DFU, so please be patient with me
> when interpreting this wrong...
>
> Is it correct that the files above differ in that the one failing is
> read via the ext4 fs
Yes.
Note that not all reads via ext4 fail, just in the case where *both* of
the two DFU-accessible storage regions are on ext4.
> driver? In that case, I guess it might be the ext4 fs driver trying to
> load something into a buffer on the stack?
I don't know the ext4 code well enough, but in general yes it might be
using stack rather than malloc/similar buffers.
> Could you try the attached patch where I added more debugging output? Maybe
> I can read something from its output.
Target:
setenv "dfu_alt_info" "/dfu_test.bin ext4 1 1;/dfu_dummy.bin ext4 1 1"
dfu 0 mmc 1
Host:
dfu-util -a 0 -D
/home/swarren/shared/git_wa/tegra-uboot-flasher/u-boot/build-p2371-2180/persistent-data/dfu_dummy.bin
-p 3-13
Target:
mmc_file_op: ext4write mmc 1:1 00000000dda3eb40 /dfu_test.bin 400
0x00000000dda26210
Host:
dfu-util -a 0 -D
/home/swarren/shared/git_wa/tegra-uboot-flasher/u-boot/build-p2371-2180/persistent-data/dfu_63.bin
-p 3-13
Target:
mmc_file_op: ext4write mmc 1:1 00000000dda3eb40 /dfu_test.bin 3f
0x00000000dda26210
Host:
dfu-util -a 1 -D
/home/swarren/shared/git_wa/tegra-uboot-flasher/u-boot/build-p2371-2180/persistent-data/dfu_dummy.bin
-p 3-13
Target:
mmc_file_op: ext4write mmc 1:1 00000000dda3eb40 /dfu_dummy.bin 400
0x00000000dda26210
Host:
dfu-util -a 0 -U
/home/swarren/shared/git_wa/tegra-uboot-flasher/u-boot/build-p2371-2180/dfu_readback.bin
-p 3-13
Target:
mmc_file_op: ext4size mmc 1:1 /dfu_test.bin 0x00000000dda260c0
mmc_file_op: ext4load mmc 1:1 00000000dda3eb40 /dfu_test.bin
0x00000000dda260c0
lmb_dump_all:
memory.cnt = 0x1
memory.size = 0x0
memory.reg[0x0].base = 0x80000000
.size = 0x60000000
reserved.cnt = 0x1
reserved.size = 0x0
reserved.reg[0x0].base = 0xdda24c50
.size = 0x25db3b0
** Reading file would overwrite reserved memory (addr: dda3eb40; len: 3f)**
dfu: Read error!
dfu_read: Failed to fill buffer
Tegra210 (P2371-2180) #
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 0:34 [U-Boot] Test failures in u-boot/master on NVIDIA HW with recent push Stephen Warren
2019-01-18 0:42 ` Tom Rini
2019-01-18 0:50 ` Stephen Warren
2019-01-18 1:15 ` Tom Rini
2019-01-18 6:29 ` Stephen Warren
2019-01-18 8:04 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-22 8:12 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-23 18:20 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2019-01-23 20:39 ` Simon Goldschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d358e4bc-94de-7cd8-b433-0bb56f2ae2da@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.