From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@nvidia.com>
To: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't attempt to schedule hpd_work on headless cards
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 22:15:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d388ebb2-fdef-400f-a62e-67352385effd@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528215344.2442-1-anarsoul@gmail.com>
On 29/5/24 07:52, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> If the card doesn't have display hardware, hpd_work and hpd_lock are
> left uninitialized which causes BUG when attempting to schedule hpd_work
> on runtime PM resume.
Hi,
Good catch, thank you for looking at this. A couple of initial comments
below:
Ben.
>
> Fix it by adding headless flag to DRM and skip any hpd if it's set.
>
> Fixes: ae1aadb1eb8d ("nouveau: don't fail driver load if no display hw present.")
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/337
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> index 13705c5f1497..4b7497a8755c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ nv04_display_fini(struct drm_device *dev, bool runtime, bool suspend)
> if (nv_two_heads(dev))
> NVWriteCRTC(dev, 1, NV_PCRTC_INTR_EN_0, 0);
>
> - if (!runtime)
> + if (!runtime && !drm->headless)
> cancel_work_sync(&drm->hpd_work);
>
> if (!suspend)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> index 88728a0b2c25..674dc567e179 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> @@ -2680,7 +2680,7 @@ nv50_display_fini(struct drm_device *dev, bool runtime, bool suspend)
> nv50_mstm_fini(nouveau_encoder(encoder));
> }
>
> - if (!runtime)
> + if (!runtime && !drm->headless)
> cancel_work_sync(&drm->hpd_work);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> index 856b3ef5edb8..b315a2ef5b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> @@ -1190,6 +1190,9 @@ nouveau_connector_hpd(struct nouveau_connector *nv_connector, u64 bits)
> u32 mask = drm_connector_mask(&nv_connector->base);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (drm->headless)
> + return;
> +
You shouldn't need this change, the function can't be called if there's
no display.
> spin_lock_irqsave(&drm->hpd_lock, flags);
> if (!(drm->hpd_pending & mask)) {
> nv_connector->hpd_pending |= bits;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> index aed5d5b51b43..1961ef665e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ nouveau_display_hpd_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev);
>
> + if (drm->headless)
> + return;
> +
> spin_lock_irq(&drm->hpd_lock);
> drm->hpd_pending = ~0;
> spin_unlock_irq(&drm->hpd_lock);
> @@ -468,6 +471,11 @@ nouveau_display_hpd_work(struct work_struct *work)
> int changed = 0;
> struct drm_connector *first_changed_connector = NULL;
>
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(drm->headless);
> +
> + if (drm->headless)
> + return;
> +
Same here.
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
>
> spin_lock_irq(&drm->hpd_lock);
> @@ -635,7 +643,7 @@ nouveau_display_fini(struct drm_device *dev, bool suspend, bool runtime)
> }
> drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
>
> - if (!runtime)
> + if (!runtime && !drm->headless)
> cancel_work_sync(&drm->hpd_work);
>
> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev);
> @@ -729,6 +737,7 @@ nouveau_display_create(struct drm_device *dev)
> /* no display hw */
> if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> ret = 0;
> + drm->headless = true;
> goto disp_create_err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> index e239c6bf4afa..25fca98a20bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ struct nouveau_drm {
> /* modesetting */
> struct nvbios vbios;
> struct nouveau_display *display;
> + bool headless;
> struct work_struct hpd_work;
> spinlock_t hpd_lock;
> u32 hpd_pending;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 21:52 [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't attempt to schedule hpd_work on headless cards Vasily Khoruzhick
2024-05-28 12:15 ` Ben Skeggs [this message]
2024-06-07 1:37 ` Dave Airlie
2024-06-07 16:52 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d388ebb2-fdef-400f-a62e-67352385effd@nvidia.com \
--to=bskeggs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.