Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: remove unused variable sysctl_compact_memory

[pintu@codeaurora.org]

On 2021-03-03 01:48, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pintu=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
>> <pintu=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org> On Behalf Of Pintu Kumar
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 9:56 AM
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux-
>> mm@kvack.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; pintu@codeaurora.org;
>> iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com; sh_def@163.com; mateusznosek0@gmail.com;
>> bhe@redhat.com; Nitin Gupta <nigupta@nvidia.com>; vbabka@suse.cz;
>> yzaikin@google.com; keescook@chromium.org; mcgrof@kernel.org;
>> mgorman@techsingularity.net
>> Cc: pintu.ping@gmail.com
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm/compaction: remove unused variable
>> sysctl_compact_memory
>> 
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>> 
>> 
>> The sysctl_compact_memory is mostly unsed in mm/compaction.c It just 
>> acts
>> as a place holder for sysctl.
>> 
>> Thus we can remove it from here and move the declaration directly in
>> kernel/sysctl.c itself.
>> This will also eliminate the extern declaration from header file.
> 
> 
> I prefer keeping the existing pattern of listing all compaction related 
> tunables
> together in compaction.h:
> 
> 	extern int sysctl_compact_memory;
> 	extern unsigned int sysctl_compaction_proactiveness;
> 	extern int sysctl_extfrag_threshold;
> 	extern int sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed;
> 

Thanks Nitin for your review.
You mean, you just wanted to retain this extern declaration ?
Any real benefit of keeping this declaration if not used elsewhere ?

> 
>> No functionality is broken or changed this way.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Pintu Kumar <pintu@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/compaction.h | 1 -
>>  kernel/sysctl.c            | 1 +
>>  mm/compaction.c            | 3 ---
>>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h 
>> index
>> ed4070e..4221888 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/compaction.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
>> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ static inline unsigned long compact_gap(unsigned int
>> order)  }
>> 
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
>> -extern int sysctl_compact_memory;
>>  extern unsigned int sysctl_compaction_proactiveness;  extern int
>> sysctl_compaction_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>>                         void *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos); 
>> diff --git
>> a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index c9fbdd8..66aff21 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int max_sched_tunable_scaling =
>> SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_END-1;  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION  static int
>> min_extfrag_threshold;  static int max_extfrag_threshold = 1000;
>> +static int sysctl_compact_memory;
>>  #endif
>> 
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c index 190ccda..ede2886
>> 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -2650,9 +2650,6 @@ static void compact_nodes(void)
>>                 compact_node(nid);
>>  }
>> 
>> -/* The written value is actually unused, all memory is compacted */ 
>> -int
>> sysctl_compact_memory;
>> -
> 
> 
> Please retain this comment for the tunable.

Sorry, I could not understand.
You mean to say just retain this last comment and only remove the 
variable ?
Again any real benefit you see in retaining this even if its not used?


Thanks,
Pintu