From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "gpio: set up initial state from .get_direction()" Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:36:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1509396602-1936-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1509396602-1936-2-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1509440926.10233.77.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:36872 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198AbdJaMgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:36:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Walleij , Mika Westerberg , Thierry Reding , Stephen Boyd , david.brown@linaro.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, Bjorn Andersson On 10/31/17 7:33 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > In this case checkpatch should have given you an error due to the > missing Signed-off-by tag:-) Indeed! Something must be broken in my checkpatch invocation. I did think that it was odd that I didn't get any complaints. Thanks. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:36:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "gpio: set up initial state from .get_direction()" In-Reply-To: References: <1509396602-1936-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1509396602-1936-2-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1509440926.10233.77.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/31/17 7:33 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > In this case checkpatch should have given you an error due to the > missing Signed-off-by tag:-) Indeed! Something must be broken in my checkpatch invocation. I did think that it was odd that I didn't get any complaints. Thanks. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.