From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Remove tests for prologue/epilogue with kfuncs
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:48:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4563561-c507-4876-8a03-40e4dca2a34e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119-skb-meta-bpf-emit-call-from-prologue-v1-4-e8b88d6430d8@cloudflare.com>
On 1/19/26 11:53 AM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> Remove pro_epilogue_with_kfunc test program and its supporting code in
> bpf_testmod. This test exercised calling kfuncs from prologue and epilogue,
> which is no longer supported after the switch to direct helper calls.
Is it easy to change it to test calling helper in pro/epilogue?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 19:53 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Switch from kfuncs to direct helper calls in prologue/epilogue Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-19 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, verifier: Support direct helper calls from prologue/epilogue Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-19 22:44 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-20 23:44 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-19 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: net_sched: Use direct helper calls instead of kfuncs in pro/epilogue Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-19 22:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-20 23:45 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-19 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Remove kfunc support in prologue and epilogue Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-19 22:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-21 9:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-21 17:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-19 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Remove tests for prologue/epilogue with kfuncs Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-19 22:56 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-20 23:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-01-21 9:49 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-01-21 19:13 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-01-23 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Switch from kfuncs to direct helper calls in prologue/epilogue Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4563561-c507-4876-8a03-40e4dca2a34e@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.