From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stuart Yoder <b08248@freescale.com>,
paulus@samba.org, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:16:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4c2a8614872f7df7d92b8bb569e08d3@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172298620.1902.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
>> Sure, for every specific case one can envision a more neat
>> and compact device tree ;-P
>
> Still... I do think that even in the general case, providing a way to
> directly encode pairs <parent,specifier> is useful, especially when
> interrupt are wired in all sort of crazy ways as is common in the
> embedded world.
If you leave the "interrupts" property intact it might indeed
be a simple/clean/compatible enough change to be useful.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-24 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 23:25 [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property Stuart Yoder
2007-02-22 0:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-22 1:18 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 7:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 10:34 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 11:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 15:47 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 17:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 19:15 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 21:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 21:57 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 22:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 4:16 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 5:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 13:08 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 14:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 2:32 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 2:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 3:45 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 11:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 0:40 ` David Gibson
2007-02-28 1:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-26 16:53 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 22:57 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 0:33 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:07 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 16:14 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-23 17:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 17:01 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 17:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 22:48 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:16 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-02-22 7:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4c2a8614872f7df7d92b8bb569e08d3@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=b08248@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.