From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: poll service ready message before failing
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 04:38:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d67fb4f4-aea2-4668-aac4-6e7eca8db4fa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221031729.2707-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
Hi Baochen,
On 2/20/24 7:17 PM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> Currently host relies on CE interrupts to get notified that
> the service ready message is ready. This results in timeout
> issue if the interrupt is not fired, due to some unknown
> reasons. See below logs:
>
> [76321.937866] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: wmi service ready event not received
> ...
> [76322.016738] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: Could not init core: -110
>
> And finally it causes WLAN interface bring up failure.
>
> Change to give it one more chance here by polling CE rings,
> before failing directly.
>
> Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00157-QCARMSWPZ-1
>
> Fixes: 5e3dd157d7e7 ("ath10k: mac80211 driver for Qualcomm Atheros 802.11ac CQA98xx devices")
> Reported-by: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/304ce305-fbe6-420e-ac2a-d61ae5e6ca1a@gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index ddf15717d504..bf6cb2c73128 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -1763,12 +1763,28 @@ void ath10k_wmi_put_wmi_channel(struct ath10k *ar, struct wmi_channel *ch,
>
> int ath10k_wmi_wait_for_service_ready(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> - unsigned long time_left;
> + unsigned long time_left, i;
>
> time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ar->wmi.service_ready,
> WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ);
> - if (!time_left)
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + if (!time_left) {
> + /* Sometimes the PCI HIF doesn't receive interrupt
> + * for the service ready message even if the buffer
> + * was completed. PCIe sniffer shows that it's
> + * because the corresponding CE ring doesn't fires
> + * it. Workaround here by polling CE rings once.
> + */
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to receive service ready completion, polling..\n");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < CE_COUNT; i++)
> + ath10k_hif_send_complete_check(ar, i, 1);
> +
> + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ar->wmi.service_ready,
> + WMI_SERVICE_READY_TIMEOUT_HZ);
> + if (!time_left)
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> base-commit: 707e306f3573fa321ae197d77366578e4566cff5
Thank you for looking at this I will test this and see if it resolves
the problem we're seeing but since its somewhat rare it may take me a
bit to validate.
Is this any different than just trying to bring up the interface again
from userspace? I could be wrong, but my concern with this is that when
I retried in userspace things got into a very odd state:
- IWD starts
- ifdown interface
- ifup interface, timeout -110
- Retry ifup, success
- Authenticate/associate succeed
- 4-way handshake fails because the device never received the 1/4 frame.
IWD would then retry indefinitely with auth/assoc succeeding but never
receiving any 4-way handshake frames. The only way to get things working
again was reloading the ath10k driver/reboot. Maybe this patch is
different because its waiting for the initial request and no issuing a
second one? Just wanted to point that out in case it sheds any light.
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 3:17 [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: poll service ready message before failing Baochen Qiang
2024-02-21 12:38 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2024-02-22 2:18 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-02-28 18:46 ` James Prestwood
2024-02-28 21:31 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-02-26 10:45 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d67fb4f4-aea2-4668-aac4-6e7eca8db4fa@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.