All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: spam@altium.nl (Dick Streefland)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security_sk_free void return fixup
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:11:41 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d69.40d038fd.d9853@altium.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.58.0406151946220.4142@ppc970.osdl.org

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
| I'm going to remove this warning from sparse. Apparently it is valid C99, 
| and somebody (I think Richard Henderson) made the excellent point that it 
| allows for type-independent code where you do something like
| 
| 	mytype myfunc1(xxx);
| 
| 	mytype myfunc2(xxx)
| 	{
| 		...
| 		return myfunc1(...);
| 	}
| 
| and it just works regardless of what type it is. 

It may work in gcc, but it is invalid according to ISO C99. First
sentence from section 6.8.6.4:

  A return statement with an expression shall not appear in a
  function whose return type is void.

Now, a function call is obviously an expression.

| sparse will obviously warn about expressions with non-void types being 
| returned from a void function, but the case where the expression exists 
| and has the right type should be ok.
| 
| I'm not sure it's wonderful C in general, but I certainly can't claim it 
| is actively offensive, and since gcc accepts it and we have these things 
| in the kernel, why complain? 

Gcc warns about this with the -pedantic option:

  $ gcc-3.3 -pedantic -c return.c
  return.c: In function `myfunc2':
  return.c:5: warning: `return' with a value, in function returning void

-- 
Dick Streefland                      ////                      Altium BV
dick.streefland@altium.nl           (@ @)          http://www.altium.com
--------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------


      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-16 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-15 23:16 [PATCH] security_sk_free void return fixup Chris Wright
2004-06-16  2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-16  3:00   ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-16  3:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-16 12:11   ` Dick Streefland [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d69.40d038fd.d9853@altium.nl \
    --to=spam@altium.nl \
    --cc=dick.streefland@altium.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.