All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Ballard <dan@mindstab.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kay.sievers@vrfy.org, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minto Joseph <mvaliyav@redhat.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] add StartTimeMonotomic, StartTimeBootTime to per  pid in   /proc
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:42:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7f132a9ede3ce67d74f899a66cdaf86@mindstab.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140124113203.GZ30183@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

>> The process starttime is useful for a variety of things, like figuring
>> out creation ordering of processes. Or it is useful to detect PID
>> reuses in a somewhat reliable way.
> 
> OK, maybe. Changelog should have said so.
> 
> Yeah, Dan was also too lazy to explain the need, and had like 3 typoes
> in the inadequate changelog he had.
> 
> Does not inspire confidence.
> 
> Now please all untwist your panties and try and submit a proper patch.

Resubmitted with more explanation (and less typos). If you feel that 
having
both CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME is really a sticking point I'd 
be
ok to remove one as long as the other made it through, as one is much 
better
than none.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-31 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-21 15:10 [PATCH 1/1] add StartTimeMonotomic, StartTimeBootTime to per pid in /proc Dan Ballard
2014-01-22 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-23 14:52   ` Dan Ballard
2014-01-23 15:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-24 10:20   ` Lennart Poettering
2014-01-24 11:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-24 12:49       ` Lennart Poettering
2014-01-31 15:42       ` Dan Ballard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7f132a9ede3ce67d74f899a66cdaf86@mindstab.net \
    --to=dan@mindstab.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mvaliyav@redhat.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.