All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de,
	perex@perex.cz
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
	kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, rander.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: introduce helpers for 'extended links' PM
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:24:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d826c3ac-4211-d4b7-38d4-059ccaea179c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc5a4267-f050-c311-5d56-a2e7cfe7e747@linux.intel.com>




>> +static int check_power_active(u32 __iomem *lctl, int sublink, bool
>> enable)
> 
> Should last argument be named 'active' instead of 'enable'? It would
> make more sense to me.

Naming is the hardest part, eh?

I am not super happy with 'active', since the 'not-active' part is not
very clear: it's not suspended, it's really powered-off/disabled.

I also didn't want to introduce a power state, since again it's on or
off and we don't want to introduce the Dx concepts here.

If I had to revisit this, my preference would be:

static int check_sublink_power(u32 __iomem *lctl, int sublink, bool enabled)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-27 11:29 [PATCH 00/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: HDaudio multi-link extension update Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 01/18] Documentation: sound: add description of Intel HDaudio multi-links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 02/18] ALSA: hda: add HDaudio Extended link definitions Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 03/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: improve hda_bus_ml_free() helper Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 04/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add return value for hda_bus_ml_get_capabilities() Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 05/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: move to a dedicated module Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 06/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add structures to parse ALT links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-30 15:51   ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-30 16:09     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-30 18:07       ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-31  3:05         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 07/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: special-case HDaudio regular links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 08/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: introduce helpers for 'extended links' PM Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-28 10:34   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-03-28 13:24     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-03-30 11:42       ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-03-30 15:54   ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-30 16:22     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 09/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add convenience helpers for SoundWire PM Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to return sublink count Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 11/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to enable/check interrupts Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 12/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to set link SYNC frequency Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 13/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers for sync_arm/sync_go Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 14/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to check cmdsync Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 15/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: program SoundWire LSDIID registers Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 16/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to retrieve DMIC/SSP hlink Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 17/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to offload link ownership Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 18/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to retrieve eml_lock Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d826c3ac-4211-d4b7-38d4-059ccaea179c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rander.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.