From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B8FC4345F for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 127766B0096; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0D8036B0098; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:35:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EE1DA6B0099; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:35:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06536B0096 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:35:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0847A0AF3 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82015946166.16.5AC1196 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062CD20002 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of ryan.roberts@arm.com designates 217.140.110.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ryan.roberts@arm.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1713285342; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wxLdtJ2vB0MZQ42arETCCZjo4OvEM2KpdnCrKWYGpVw=; b=2ZyfsO1tVu3tdz7criYtZecw/p6gi72LqQfm6FaUsPGL7RmYJeYr/M6rOyXd/xXpw3ceHy 21m+0mDFwussRYLlFHNaybwyclDm/0oBs59M63OHe6jse0+zQlAwfj6WGy0dmxYVEjGRTU AkalKB7qxFdJ2bdeegPwtKcia5uDEx0= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1713285342; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qTViP+yKPuVTx8vKaGKZSE+1UvNoZX2wVjjOl2ljTOKvRW7ejfc5HWGoYSFiANtQAPh9hl Xynmlq/IHdQ/E0qP2UJzjWvTlPPuitjlhJ8fSA9h9zmjBEulbrMWgjUki3vRfnMS4EfDsT D3LfPJGEqx+KbdN/JPx2PCEHMdRAJSM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of ryan.roberts@arm.com designates 217.140.110.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ryan.roberts@arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279E8339; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.39.189] (XHFQ2J9959.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.39.189]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B5C03F792; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:35:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/madvise: optimize lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free Content-Language: en-GB To: Lance Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: david@redhat.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com, zokeefe@google.com, shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240416033457.32154-1-ioworker0@gmail.com> <20240416033457.32154-4-ioworker0@gmail.com> From: Ryan Roberts In-Reply-To: <20240416033457.32154-4-ioworker0@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: at17cky6yoyopoz9uqw6wrwaddkxmmwk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 062CD20002 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1713285341-241230 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 16/04/2024 04:34, Lance Yang wrote: > This patch optimizes lazyfreeing with PTE-mapped mTHP[1] > (Inspired by David Hildenbrand[2]). We aim to avoid unnecessary folio > splitting if the large folio is fully mapped within the target range. > > If a large folio is locked or shared, or if we fail to split it, we just > leave it in place and advance to the next PTE in the range. But note that > the behavior is changed; previously, any failure of this sort would cause > the entire operation to give up. As large folios become more common, > sticking to the old way could result in wasted opportunities. > > On an Intel I5 CPU, lazyfreeing a 1GiB VMA backed by PTE-mapped folios of > the same size results in the following runtimes for madvise(MADV_FREE) in > seconds (shorter is better): > > Folio Size | Old | New | Change > ------------------------------------------ > 4KiB | 0.590251 | 0.590259 | 0% > 16KiB | 2.990447 | 0.185655 | -94% > 32KiB | 2.547831 | 0.104870 | -95% > 64KiB | 2.457796 | 0.052812 | -97% > 128KiB | 2.281034 | 0.032777 | -99% > 256KiB | 2.230387 | 0.017496 | -99% > 512KiB | 2.189106 | 0.010781 | -99% > 1024KiB | 2.183949 | 0.007753 | -99% > 2048KiB | 0.002799 | 0.002804 | 0% > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231207161211.2374093-5-ryan.roberts@arm.com > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240214204435.167852-1-david@redhat.com > > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang > --- > mm/internal.h | 12 ++++- > mm/madvise.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > mm/memory.c | 4 +- > 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h > index 2adc3f616b71..5d5e49b86fe3 100644 > --- a/mm/internal.h > +++ b/mm/internal.h > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ static inline pte_t __pte_batch_clear_ignored(pte_t pte, fpb_t flags) > * first one is writable. > * @any_young: Optional pointer to indicate whether any entry except the > * first one is young. > + * @any_dirty: Optional pointer to indicate whether any entry except the > + * first one is dirty. > * > * Detect a PTE batch: consecutive (present) PTEs that map consecutive > * pages of the same large folio. > @@ -149,18 +151,20 @@ static inline pte_t __pte_batch_clear_ignored(pte_t pte, fpb_t flags) > */ > static inline int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr, > pte_t *start_ptep, pte_t pte, int max_nr, fpb_t flags, > - bool *any_writable, bool *any_young) > + bool *any_writable, bool *any_young, bool *any_dirty) > { > unsigned long folio_end_pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio); > const pte_t *end_ptep = start_ptep + max_nr; > pte_t expected_pte, *ptep; > - bool writable, young; > + bool writable, young, dirty; > int nr; > > if (any_writable) > *any_writable = false; > if (any_young) > *any_young = false; > + if (any_dirty) > + *any_dirty = false; > > VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!pte_present(pte), folio); > VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio) || max_nr < 1, folio); > @@ -176,6 +180,8 @@ static inline int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr, > writable = !!pte_write(pte); > if (any_young) > young = !!pte_young(pte); > + if (any_dirty) > + dirty = !!pte_dirty(pte); > pte = __pte_batch_clear_ignored(pte, flags); > > if (!pte_same(pte, expected_pte)) > @@ -193,6 +199,8 @@ static inline int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr, > *any_writable |= writable; > if (any_young) > *any_young |= young; > + if (any_dirty) > + *any_dirty |= dirty; > > nr = pte_batch_hint(ptep, pte); > expected_pte = pte_advance_pfn(expected_pte, nr); > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c > index edb592adb749..a6bfbbd881e9 100644 > --- a/mm/madvise.c > +++ b/mm/madvise.c > @@ -321,6 +321,39 @@ static inline bool can_do_file_pageout(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > file_permission(vma->vm_file, MAY_WRITE) == 0; > } > > +static inline int madvise_folio_pte_batch(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > + struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep, > + pte_t pte, bool *any_young, > + bool *any_dirty) > +{ > + int max_nr = (end - addr) / PAGE_SIZE; > + const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY; > + > + return folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, ptep, pte, max_nr, fpb_flags, NULL, > + any_young, any_dirty); > +} > + > +static inline bool madvise_pte_split_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, > + unsigned long addr, > + struct folio *folio, pte_t **pte, > + spinlock_t **ptl) > +{ > + int err; > + > + if (!folio_trylock(folio)) > + return false; > + > + folio_get(folio); > + pte_unmap_unlock(*pte, *ptl); > + err = split_folio(folio); > + folio_unlock(folio); > + folio_put(folio); > + > + *pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, ptl); > + > + return err == 0; > +} > + > static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, > unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > struct mm_walk *walk) > @@ -456,41 +489,30 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, > * next pte in the range. > */ > if (folio_test_large(folio)) { > - const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | > - FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY; > - int max_nr = (end - addr) / PAGE_SIZE; > bool any_young; > > - nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pte, ptent, max_nr, > - fpb_flags, NULL, &any_young); > - if (any_young) > - ptent = pte_mkyoung(ptent); > + nr = madvise_folio_pte_batch(addr, end, folio, pte, > + ptent, &any_young, NULL); > > if (nr < folio_nr_pages(folio)) { > - int err; > - > if (folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) > continue; > if (pageout_anon_only_filter && !folio_test_anon(folio)) > continue; > - if (!folio_trylock(folio)) > - continue; > - folio_get(folio); > + > arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl); > - start_pte = NULL; > - err = split_folio(folio); > - folio_unlock(folio); > - folio_put(folio); > - start_pte = pte = > - pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); > + if (madvise_pte_split_folio(mm, pmd, addr, > + folio, &start_pte, &ptl)) > + nr = 0; > if (!start_pte) > break; > + pte = start_pte; > arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - if (!err) > - nr = 0; > continue; > } > + > + if (any_young) > + ptent = pte_mkyoung(ptent); > } > > /* > @@ -688,44 +710,51 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, > continue; > > /* > - * If pmd isn't transhuge but the folio is large and > - * is owned by only this process, split it and > - * deactivate all pages. > + * If we encounter a large folio, only split it if it is not > + * fully mapped within the range we are operating on. Otherwise > + * leave it as is so that it can be marked as lazyfree. If we > + * fail to split a folio, leave it in place and advance to the > + * next pte in the range. > */ > if (folio_test_large(folio)) { > - int err; > + bool any_young, any_dirty; > > - if (folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) > - break; > - if (!folio_trylock(folio)) > - break; > - folio_get(folio); > - arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl); > - start_pte = NULL; > - err = split_folio(folio); > - folio_unlock(folio); > - folio_put(folio); > - if (err) > - break; > - start_pte = pte = > - pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); > - if (!start_pte) > - break; > - arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - pte--; > - addr -= PAGE_SIZE; > - continue; > + nr = madvise_folio_pte_batch(addr, end, folio, pte, > + ptent, &any_young, &any_dirty); > + > + if (nr < folio_nr_pages(folio)) { > + if (folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) > + continue; > + > + arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); > + if (madvise_pte_split_folio(mm, pmd, addr, > + folio, &start_pte, &ptl)) > + nr = 0; > + if (!start_pte) > + break; > + pte = start_pte; > + arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); > + continue; > + } > + > + if (any_young) > + ptent = pte_mkyoung(ptent); > + if (any_dirty) > + ptent = pte_mkdirty(ptent); > } > > + if (folio_mapcount(folio) != folio_nr_pages(folio)) > + continue; Why is this here? I thought we had previously concluded to only do this test inside the below if statement (where you have it duplicated). > + > if (folio_test_swapcache(folio) || folio_test_dirty(folio)) { > if (!folio_trylock(folio)) > continue; > /* > - * If folio is shared with others, we mustn't clear > - * the folio's dirty flag. > + * If we have a large folio at this point, we know it is > + * fully mapped so if its mapcount is the same as its > + * number of pages, it must be exclusive. > */ > - if (folio_mapcount(folio) != 1) { > + if (folio_mapcount(folio) != folio_nr_pages(folio)) { > folio_unlock(folio); > continue; > } > @@ -741,19 +770,10 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, > } > > if (pte_young(ptent) || pte_dirty(ptent)) { > - /* > - * Some of architecture(ex, PPC) don't update TLB > - * with set_pte_at and tlb_remove_tlb_entry so for > - * the portability, remap the pte with old|clean > - * after pte clearing. > - */ > - ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte, > - tlb->fullmm); > - > - ptent = pte_mkold(ptent); > - ptent = pte_mkclean(ptent); > - set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptent); > - tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr); > + clear_young_dirty_ptes(vma, addr, pte, nr, > + CYDP_CLEAR_YOUNG | > + CYDP_CLEAR_DIRTY); > + tlb_remove_tlb_entries(tlb, pte, nr, addr); > } > folio_mark_lazyfree(folio); > } > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 33d87b64d15d..9e07d1b9020c 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma > flags |= FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY; > > nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, src_pte, pte, max_nr, flags, > - &any_writable, NULL); > + &any_writable, NULL, NULL); > folio_ref_add(folio, nr); > if (folio_test_anon(folio)) { > if (unlikely(folio_try_dup_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page, > @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static inline int zap_present_ptes(struct mmu_gather *tlb, > */ > if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio) && max_nr != 1)) { > nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pte, ptent, max_nr, fpb_flags, > - NULL, NULL); > + NULL, NULL, NULL); > > zap_present_folio_ptes(tlb, vma, folio, page, pte, ptent, nr, > addr, details, rss, force_flush,