From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: liwanwu <liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Reject NMI calls to lock-taking kfuncs
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:51:50 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d84b31727f04e1ed0d40042ba1c09e61@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d5f2636-a5e3-4b67-bbb9-12922fa0d804@kylinos.cn>
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 09:48:28PM +0800, liwanwu wrote:
> Three "any"-category kfuncs read scx_locked_rq() on their success path
> and treat a non-NULL return as "the rq lock is already held by me",
> which a false positive under NMI turns into either a data race or a
> wrong result:
Let's add the in_nmi() test to scx_locked_rq() so that it returns NULL from
NMI. That sends all three down their unlocked paths.
> pick_idle_cpu_from_online_nodes() (kernel/sched/ext/idle.c:151), which
> writes the per-CPU nodemask per_cpu_unvisited (idle.c:146) under only
> preempt_disable(). preempt_disable() does not mask NMIs, so an NMI that
> lands on a CPU whose interrupted context is mid-way through that loop
> clobbers the scratch nodemask the interrupted context is still
> iterating.
That probably needs to be irqsave'd. preempt_disable() doesn't mask IRQs
either and the idle kfuncs can be called from IRQ-enabled contexts. As for
NMI, if someone is calling pick_idle from NMI, they're asking for it. As
long as the machine doesn't crash, it doesn't matter.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 9:56 [PATCH] sched_ext: Reject NMI calls to lock-taking kfuncs Wanwu Li
2026-09-01 19:51 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 20:13 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-01 20:28 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-02 2:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 6:44 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-02 9:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:05 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-03 1:46 ` liwanwu
2026-09-02 13:48 ` [PATCH v2] " liwanwu
2026-09-02 21:51 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d84b31727f04e1ed0d40042ba1c09e61@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwanwu@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.