From: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
To: "Patrick Ohly" <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
"José Bollo" <jobol@nonadev.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:39:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d85e2e6d-e7b1-8ebd-e3ce-01a26bdabbcc@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515062493.10775.21.camel@intel.com>
On 01/04/2018 06:41 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 11:18 +0100, José Bollo wrote:
>>> Do you agree to move the patch to Smack specific layer? Such as
>>> meta-security?
>>
>> I agree.
>
> Layers like meta-security should not modify recipes from other layers,
> at least not by default. That would violate the "Yocto Compatible 2.0"
> rules.
>
> Besides, it would be harder to maintain in a separate layer - for the
> maintainer of that layer.
>
> I still think this patch belong into OE-core, even though it is then
> more work for the OE-core maintainer.
>
If so, I think we should wrapper the logic with:
+#if defined(WITH_ATTR) && !defined(WITH_SELINUX)
+ attr_copy_file (def_template, user_home, NULL, NULL);
+#endif
Or just add a new condition like WITH_SMACK or something.
Thanks
Wenzong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 14:07 [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes jobol
2017-03-09 16:07 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-09 16:48 ` José Bollo
2017-03-09 17:18 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15 8:04 ` José Bollo
2018-01-04 9:28 ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04 9:31 ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04 10:18 ` José Bollo
2018-01-04 10:41 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-04 11:39 ` wenzong fan [this message]
2018-01-04 11:50 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-05 1:07 ` Fan, Wenzong
2018-01-09 17:01 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-10 9:50 ` wenzong fan
2018-01-15 14:33 ` José Bollo
2018-01-15 16:58 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-16 2:53 ` wenzong fan
2018-01-09 17:51 ` Mark Hatle
2018-01-10 11:15 ` Patrick Ohly
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-13 9:57 jobol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d85e2e6d-e7b1-8ebd-e3ce-01a26bdabbcc@windriver.com \
--to=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
--cc=jobol@nonadev.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.