From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: xenomai 3.1/ipipe-core-4.19.128-cip28-arm-10.patch References: <16c407c9-8ed4-4b43-b38b-aac8a270e686@gmail.com> From: Robert Berger Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:04:46 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Gallagher Cc: "Xenomai@xenomai.org" It looks like either we hit a glibc issue, or something is not clear to me in the xenomai test case. The glibc has a fallback for the unknown syscall. clock_nanosleep_time64 Is this what the xenomai testcase tries to tell us? Than that is not an error, but fine;) Regards, Robert