From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
To: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Add LIST option to USERQ ioctl
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 15:18:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8c33c5a-37e5-403a-ad1d-bb1da77d114d@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827185935.89623-1-David.Francis@amd.com>
On 27/08/2026 19:59, David Francis wrote:
> Add a new option to ioctl USERQ which provides information
> to a process about their own user queues on the queried
> device.
>
> The returned data is in the same format as that used to
> create the queue in the first place.
>
> The interface uses retries; the user can guess at the number
> of queues required; if insufficiently large, the correct
> value will be returned.
> The same is done for the mqd sizes of each entry.
>
> This operation holds userq_mutex for its entire duration
> to prevent the queues from being freed or modified under it.
>
> v3: Don't acquire xa_lock and other misc fixes
>
> Signed-off-by: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h | 40 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> index 3fe10d6af757..32d1787aa7e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> @@ -850,6 +850,8 @@ static int amdgpu_userq_input_args_validate(struct drm_device *dev,
> args->in.mqd_size)
> return -EINVAL;
> break;
> + case AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_LIST:
> + break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -857,6 +859,157 @@ static int amdgpu_userq_input_args_validate(struct drm_device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int
> +amdgpu_userq_list(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
> +{
> + struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv = filp->driver_priv;
> + struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr = &fpriv->userq_mgr;
> + struct drm_amdgpu_userq_list_entry *entries;
> + struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue;
> + unsigned long queue_id;
> + size_t mqd_size, entry_buffer_size;
> + uint32_t num_queues = 0;
> + int ret;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> +
> + xa_for_each(&uq_mgr->userq_xa, queue_id, queue) {
> + num_queues += 1;
> + }
Previously I suggested not holding the mutex here and I still don't see
what value it brings, apart from making error handling more complicated.
AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE does not take it so the count can still change, no?
> +
> + if (num_queues > args->list_in_out.num_entries) {
> + /**
> + * If the num_entries buffer is too small,
> + * return the correct size. User should
> + * try again with the right space allocated.
> + */
> + args->list_in_out.num_entries = num_queues;
> + mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + args->list_in_out.num_entries = num_queues;
Assignment can go before the if and then you can remove the one inside
the block.
> +
> + if (num_queues == 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + entries = kvmalloc_objs(typeof(*entries), num_queues, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!entries) {
> + mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + ret = check_mul_overflow(num_queues, sizeof(*entries), &entry_buffer_size);
Could move to before the allocation which would perhaps be more logical.
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
Maybe a different error code since userspace cannot do anything about
it. E2BIG? Not sure which one just that EINVAL would be confusing.
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = copy_from_user(entries, u64_to_user_ptr(args->list_in_out.entries),
> + entry_buffer_size);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + xa_for_each(&uq_mgr->userq_xa, queue_id, queue) {
> + /**
> + * The xa may have added or removed queues since we counted
> + * them, so break if there are now more queues than entries.
> + */
> + if (i >= num_queues)
> + break;
> + /**
> + * Check mqd size. As with num_entries, return the right sizes
> + * if they are too small. These sizes also serve as
> + * versioning for the mqd. Despite the names, these are the
> + * mqd sizes for both gfx11 and gfx12.
> + */
> + if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_COMPUTE) {
> + mqd_size = sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_compute_gfx11);
> + } else if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_GFX) {
> + mqd_size = sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_gfx11);
> + } else if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA) {
> + mqd_size = sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_sdma_gfx11);
> + } else {
> + drm_err_once(adev_to_drm(uq_mgr->adev), "Unrecognized mqd size in USERQ_OP_LIST");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
Or with switch statements here and below. Up to you what you find more
readable.
> +
> + if (mqd_size > entries[i].mqd_size) {
> + entries[i].mqd_size = mqd_size;
> + entries[i].ip_type = queue->queue_type;
> + i += 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> + entries[i].mqd_size = mqd_size;
> + entries[i].ip_type = queue->queue_type;
These two assignments can also be moved before the if and the ones
inside the block removed.
> +
> + entries[i].queue_id = queue_id;
> + /* userq prop handling */
> + entries[i].queue_va = queue->userq_prop->hqd_base_gpu_addr;
> + entries[i].queue_size = queue->userq_prop->queue_size;
> + entries[i].rptr_va = queue->userq_prop->rptr_gpu_addr;
> + entries[i].wptr_va = queue->userq_prop->wptr_gpu_addr;
> + /* flag handling (AMDGPU_USERQ_CREATE_FLAGS_QUEUE_PRIORITY_MASK are the only flags in use) */
> + entries[i].flags = (queue->priority << AMDGPU_USERQ_CREATE_FLAGS_QUEUE_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
> + & AMDGPU_USERQ_CREATE_FLAGS_QUEUE_PRIORITY_MASK;
> + /* doorbell handling */
> + entries[i].doorbell_handle = queue->doorbell_handle;
> + /* This is the inverse of the calculation used in amdgpu_doorbell_index_on_bar
> + * doorbell_index = db_bo_offset / sizeof(u32)
> + * + doorbell_offset * DIV_ROUND_UP(db_size, 4)
> + * db_size is always sizeof(u64) = 8
> + */
> + entries[i].doorbell_offset =
> + (queue->doorbell_index - amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(queue->db_obj.obj) / 4) / 2;
> +
> + if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_COMPUTE) {
> + struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_compute_gfx11 compute_mqd = {0};
> +
> + compute_mqd.eop_va = queue->userq_prop->eop_gpu_addr;
Matter of taste but you could also write this as:
struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_compute_gfx11 compute_mqd = {
.eop_va = queue->userq_prop->eop_gpu_addr;
};
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(entries[i].mqd_data),
> + &compute_mqd,
> + entries[i].mqd_size);
> + } else if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_GFX) {
> + struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_gfx11 mqd_gfx_v11 = {0};
> +
> + mqd_gfx_v11.shadow_va = queue->userq_prop->shadow_addr;
> + mqd_gfx_v11.csa_va = queue->userq_prop->csa_addr;
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(entries[i].mqd_data),
> + &mqd_gfx_v11,
> + entries[i].mqd_size);
> + } else if (queue->queue_type == AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA) {
> + struct drm_amdgpu_userq_mqd_sdma_gfx11 mqd_sdma_v11 = {0};
> +
> + mqd_sdma_v11.csa_va = queue->userq_prop->csa_addr;
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(entries[i].mqd_data),
> + &mqd_sdma_v11,
> + entries[i].mqd_size);
> + }
Some optional comments:
mqd_size would be more direct in all three and could save some lines.
Also maybe see if caching entries[i] and queue->userq_prop in locals
would make it even more compact/readable.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + i += 1;
> + }
> + ret = copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(args->list_in_out.entries), entries,
> + num_queues * sizeof(*entries));
> + if (ret)
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> +exit:
> + mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> + kvfree(entries);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> bool amdgpu_userq_enabled(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(dev);
> @@ -891,7 +1044,7 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> drm_file_err(filp, "Failed to create usermode queue\n");
> break;
>
> - case AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE: {
> + case AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE:
> xa_lock(&fpriv->userq_mgr.userq_xa);
> queue = __xa_erase(&fpriv->userq_mgr.userq_xa, args->in.queue_id);
> xa_unlock(&fpriv->userq_mgr.userq_xa);
> @@ -900,8 +1053,9 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
> amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> break;
> - }
> -
> + case AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_LIST:
> + r = amdgpu_userq_list(filp, args);
> + break;
> default:
> drm_dbg_driver(dev, "Invalid user queue op specified: %d\n", args->in.op);
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
> index b32c72a662b6..92738d630eea 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ union drm_amdgpu_ctx {
> /* user queue IOCTL operations */
> #define AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_CREATE 1
> #define AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE 2
> +#define AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_LIST 3
>
> /* queue priority levels */
> /* low < normal low < normal high < high */
> @@ -425,9 +426,48 @@ struct drm_amdgpu_userq_out {
> __u32 _pad;
> };
>
> +struct drm_amdgpu_userq_list_entry {
> + /** Userspace pointer to buffer holding mqd */
> + __u64 mqd_data;
> + /**
> + * In: Size of mqd_data user-allocated buffer.
> + * Out: If mqd_data was insufficiently large, the
> + * size it needs to be.
> + */
> + __u32 mqd_size;
> +
> + /** Definitions same as drm_amdgpu_userq_in */
> + __u32 queue_id;
> + __u32 ip_type;
> + __u32 doorbell_handle;
> + __u32 doorbell_offset;
> + __u32 flags;
> + __u64 queue_va;
> + __u64 queue_size;
> + __u64 rptr_va;
> + __u64 wptr_va;
> +};
> +
> +struct drm_amdgpu_userq_list_in_out {
> + /**
> + * For operation AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_LIST: User will provide a buffer, which the
> + * driver will fill with information about all of that process's queues on this device.
> + */
> + /** AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_LIST */
> + __u32 op;
> + /**
> + * Size of entries buffer / Number of handles in process
> + * (if larger than size of buffer, must retry)
> + */
> + __u32 num_entries;
> + /* User pointer to array of drm_amdgpu_userq_list_entry */
> + __u64 entries;
> +};
> +
> union drm_amdgpu_userq {
> struct drm_amdgpu_userq_in in;
> struct drm_amdgpu_userq_out out;
> + struct drm_amdgpu_userq_list_in_out list_in_out;
> };
>
> /* GFX V11 IP specific MQD parameters */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 18:59 [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Add LIST option to USERQ ioctl David Francis
2026-08-27 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Add CHANGE_ID option for " David Francis
2026-09-07 13:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-18 15:15 ` Francis, David
2026-09-21 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-07 14:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8c33c5a-37e5-403a-ad1d-bb1da77d114d@igalia.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=David.Francis@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.