From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: "Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@vates.tech>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Strip build path directories in tools and hypervisor
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:15:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8d57a91-eaca-4896-ab59-72136c54a5e4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLmhz9P1c9wYjdwp@mail-itl>
On 04.09.2025 16:27, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:58:20PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.09.2025 13:41, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> Use -fdebug-prefix-map in preference to -ffile-prefix-map, as it's
>>> available in earlier toolchain versions. But use it together with
>>> -fmacro-prefix-map (if available) for hypervisor build, otherwise it
>>> still contains some paths in out-of-tree builds.
>>
>> I consider it wrong not to use -ffile-prefix-map when available. That
>> already covers more than "debug" and "macro", and it may gain further
>> functionality.
>
> I asked about that on v1 and got ambiguous answer suggesting the opposite:
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/0370c0eb1fd9ac00acab016792132fa0b943d384.1742317309.git-series.marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com/T/#m74a8883835e30fb74a85b07a7b14507ee52e7c65
Ambiguous answer(s)? There's no reply to that mail of yours, and I don't
see how the conclusion drawn fits my earlier comment. That was more
towards what I did in v1 of my patch - fall back to the more widely
supported option when the less widely available one can't be used.
>>> --- a/tools/Makefile
>>> +++ b/tools/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> -XEN_ROOT = $(CURDIR)/..
>>> +XEN_ROOT = $(realpath $(CURDIR)/..)
>>>
>>> export PKG_CONFIG_DIR = $(CURDIR)/pkg-config
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/Rules.mk b/tools/Rules.mk
>>> index 725c3c32e9a2..428fce094819 100644
>>> --- a/tools/Rules.mk
>>> +++ b/tools/Rules.mk
>>> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ endif
>>> CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += $(call cc-option,$(CC),-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs)
>>> CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS-y)
>>>
>>> +$(call cc-option-add,CFLAGS,CC,-fdebug-prefix-map=$(realpath $(XEN_ROOT))=.)
>>
>> Here and below - no need to use cc-option-add for -fdebug-prefix-map,
>> which all permissible compilers support.
>
> Ok.
>
>> Further, again as per reply to Andrew on the thread hanging off of my
>> patch - I don't view it as desirable to leave the tools/ prefix in
>> place, or e.g. for libraries, the entire tools/libs/<subdir>/ part.
>> Imo every binary should have only the path (if any) from its own source
>> root left. (And yes, how to deal with e.g. shared include files isn't
>> quite clear to me, yet. Maybe we actually need to pass two options.)
>
> I don't think it's valid to strip arbitrary prefixes from debug symbols,
> especially in tools. This will break some automated tools that try to match
> coredumps (and similar) to source code and sometimes even debug symbols
> too. But even for manual usage, having to jump between directories (I'm
> not sure if gdb supports multiple source dirs at once?)
Pretty necessarily: When debugging you might easily cross project boundaries.
> just because you
> happen to debug a binary that use more of libraries isn't exactly
> desirable.
> I think the paths in debug symbols and similar should match the layout
> in the source repository, not a subset of it.
Well, okay, we disagree here. To me, xen.git really is an agglomeration of
too many things in a single repo. If things were properly split, you'd end
up with what I'm asking for anyway.
> Theoretically this doesn't apply to the hypervisor yet, as I'm not aware
> of any tool processing xen memory dumps automatically (and those for
> manual usage are quite unstable, to say the least...). But I don't think
> it's an excuse to have incomplete paths in there, just to save few
> bytes?
> The only case where I can see it would make some sense is out of tree
> build, where indeed it's about just the hypervisor, not the toolstack
> (IMO due to the build system limitation, but well...). But at the same
> time, having different path variant depending on it-tree/out-of-tree
> build feels weird.
Which is why I'm arguing for the dropping of the xen/ prefixes, as that's
how things come out in in-tree builds.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 11:41 [PATCH v2] Strip build path directories in tools and hypervisor Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-09-04 12:58 ` Jan Beulich
2025-09-04 14:27 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-09-05 8:15 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2025-09-05 10:55 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8d57a91-eaca-4896-ab59-72136c54a5e4@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.