All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huangdengdui <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	<aman.deep.singh@intel.com>, <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	<liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: handle IEEE1588 init fail
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:52:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8f192e2-3be8-48e1-b7d7-4db24cc41ab5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405094427.32d19496@hermes.local>



On 2024/4/6 0:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:44:09 +0800
> Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> When the port's timestamping function failed to initialize
>> (for example, the device does not support PTP), the packets
>> received by the hardware do not contain the timestamp.
>> In this case, IEEE1588 packet forwarding should not start.
>> This patch fix it.
>>
>> Plus, adding a failure message when failed to disable PTP.
>>
>> Fixes: a78040c990cb ("app/testpmd: update forward engine beginning")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> 
> Noticed that ieee1588 part is printing errors to stdout,
> but other parts of test-pmd are using stderr or TEST_PMD_LOG.
> 
> It would be good to decide on one good way to handle this
> across all of testpmd.

Yeah, it's a bit of a mess. Is it better to use TEST_PMD_LOG?
But this is a test app, and modifying it seems unnecessary.
What should we do next?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-30  7:44 [PATCH] app/testpmd: handle IEEE1588 init fail Dengdui Huang
2024-04-05 15:36 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2024-07-05 11:27   ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-08  5:52   ` huangdengdui [this message]
2024-04-08  8:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-09  2:06       ` huangdengdui
2024-04-09  2:50         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-17  9:26           ` huangdengdui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8f192e2-3be8-48e1-b7d7-4db24cc41ab5@huawei.com \
    --to=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.