All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hendrik Visage <hvjunk@gmail.com>
To: Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: False "lost ticks" on dual-Opteron system (=> timer twice as fast)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 21:42:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d93f04c705052112426ee35154@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505081445.26663.bernd.paysan@gmx.de>

On 5/8/05, Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've recently set up a dual Opteron RAID server (AMD-8000-based Tyan
> Thunder K8S Pro SCSI board, 2 246 Opterons, stepping 10). Kernel is a
> modified 2.6.11.4-20a from SuSE 9.3 (SMP version, sure). The Opterons
> are capable of changing the CPU frequency (between 1GHz and 2GHz).

I'll be delving deeper into this thread soon, but I'm seeing similar
strangeness
on a Athlon64 (rated:3G+ real:2009MHz clock), 2.6.11-r8 (gentoo), MSI
K8N Neo Platinum.

ntp syncs time, then I start a couple of compiles, and I see ntp
losing track of time, big jitter etc. (and the one time source is in
on the local LAN syncing to the same remote servers). openntp I
noticed it also.

What I have noticed in my dmesg output is that I see "lost timer ticks
CPU Frequency change?" messages very early in the boot up.

> What I can't believe is that I'm the only one who has this problem.

I've seen this for about a week or three, and somehow I believe it
wasn't a problem before 2.6.11.

-- 
Hendrik Visage

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-21 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-08 12:45 False "lost ticks" on dual-Opteron system (=> timer twice as fast) Bernd Paysan
2005-05-08 13:40 ` [suse-amd64] " Andi Kleen
2005-05-08 16:22   ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-09 10:53   ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-09 13:17     ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 10:53       ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-05-10 13:32         ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 11:12       ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 11:36         ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 11:54         ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 13:07           ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 13:15             ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 13:21               ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 13:39                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-21 19:42 ` Hendrik Visage [this message]
2005-05-21 20:54   ` Scott Robert Ladd
     [not found]   ` <428F9FA6.1000800@coyotegulch.com>
     [not found]     ` <d93f04c70505211500216d8614@mail.gmail.com>
2005-05-23 11:50       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-23 23:04         ` Hendrik Visage
2005-05-25 17:06           ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d93f04c705052112426ee35154@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hvjunk@gmail.com \
    --cc=bernd.paysan@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suse-amd64@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.