Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix Null-Pointer Dereference in kernel_clone() via BPF fmod_ret on security_task_alloc

[Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>]

On 10/4/26 15:21, Leon Hwang wrote:
> On 10/4/26 14:10, Feng Yang wrote:
>> From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +
>> +static int check_attach_sleepable(u32 btf_id, unsigned long addr, const char *func_name)
>> +{
>> +	/* fentry/fexit/fmod_ret progs can be sleepable if they are
>> +	 * attached to ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION and are not in denylist.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!check_non_sleepable_error_inject(btf_id) &&
>> +	    within_error_injection_list(addr))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int check_attach_modify_return(unsigned long addr, const char *func_name)
>> +{
>> +	if (within_error_injection_list(addr) ||
>> +	    !strncmp(SECURITY_PREFIX, func_name, sizeof(SECURITY_PREFIX) - 1))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>> +}
> 
> Why did you move them here? Seems that you didn't use them.
> 
>> +
>> +static int modify_return_get_retval_range(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> +					  struct bpf_retval_range *retval_range)
> 
> NIT: code format issue here.
> 

Sorry about this. It is false. I was misled by thunderbird.

> Thanks,
> Leon
> 
>> +{
> [...]
>