From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Ryden <markryde@gmail.com>
Subject: USB backend and XenBus
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:50:58 +0200
Message-ID: <dac45060509170950522d2481@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: markryde@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hello,

   I wonder why USB backend does not use XenBus. (in xen unstable).
  =20
   Network  backend and Block backend do use XenBus.=20

   And USB backend seems to have much in common with them. (Rings,
event channels,etc).

   Is it a task to be done in the future, or is there some
architectural or other

  reason that  XenBus will not be used by USB backend  at all ?=20

  Can someone elaborate on it in 2-3 sentences (or more, if he likes) ?=20

   TIA,
       MR