From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:53:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([IPv6:::ffff:64.233.170.193]:45261 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:53:24 +0100 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so289243rne for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:55:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tjbMPGp6ruVfKJWgNBrNeO+V9qL/B1nfMuf6yTqc8w3En2Oqrt7yjriUuInAtsccKl/PLIA3I+8IiTCeS0NB+fgVORiJFxwkk7zY58eLaM1JPB0Aps+lZ2bmPSsufDLiNvDTMbYrUPNQcHjhXaohCOkOCUM83A7x8UJtqyH0gwQ= Received: by 10.38.207.47 with SMTP id e47mr528429rng; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.62 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:55:58 -0400 From: David Cummings Reply-To: David Cummings To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: o32 glibc-2.3.5 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8648 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: real.psyence@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On 7/27/05, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, David Cummings wrote: > > > greatly appreciate it. I've been looking in glibc's bugzilla but can't > > find the right bug. Thanks! > > #758 > > Maciej > Alright, thanks. I had found that, but it didn't seem to apply to the problem with socket, as that had already been applied when the socket happened. I'm also now having a problem with n32 which is similar if not the same as the one Rolf had not too long ago. Something about a __fork_block not being found. Anyplace else I should look? Thanks, -Dave -- The way that can be named is not the Way.