All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shyam Sundar S K <ssundark@amd.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Sen, Pankaj" <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>,
	"Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com>,
	"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD, eMMC-4.5.1
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:08:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbebff7a-d144-9dc5-6e59-3a39274ee21d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fed9224-f843-fbd4-6ae6-fd0708bc6c98@intel.com>



On 11/11/2016 6:11 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 10/11/16 14:51, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>> This patch adds support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sen, Pankaj <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> index 782c8d2..9576f82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> @@ -817,6 +817,171 @@ enum amd_chipset_gen {
>>  	AMD_CHIPSET_UNKNOWN,
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct sdhci_ops amd_sdhci_pci_ops;
>> +
>> +struct amd_tuning_descriptor {
>> +	u8 tune_around;
>> +	bool this_tune_ok;
>> +	bool last_tune_ok;
>> +	u8 valid_front;
>> +	u8 valid_window_max;
>> +	u8 tune_low_max;
>> +	u8 tune_low;
>> +	u8 valid_window;
>> +	u8 tune_result;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int amd_tuning_reset(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int val;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> +	val |= SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE | SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
>> +	sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> +
>> +	val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> +	val &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
>> +	sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_config_tuning_phase(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 phase)
>> +{
>> +	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
>> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
>> +	unsigned int val;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
>> +	val &= ~0x1f;
>> +	val |= (0x10800 | (phase << 1));
>> +	pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_find_good_phase(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> +{
>> +	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
>> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
>> +	struct amd_tuning_descriptor *td = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
>> +
>> +	unsigned int val;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	if (td->this_tune_ok)
>> +		td->valid_front += 1;
>> +	if ((!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok) ||
>> +	    (td->tune_around == 11)) {
>> +		if (td->valid_window > td->valid_window_max) {
>> +			td->valid_window_max = td->valid_window;
>> +			td->tune_low_max = td->tune_low;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	if (td->this_tune_ok && (!td->last_tune_ok))
>> +		td->tune_low = td->tune_around;
>> +	if (!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok)
>> +		td->valid_window = 0;
>> +	else if (td->this_tune_ok)
>> +		td->valid_window += 1;
>> +
>> +	td->last_tune_ok = td->this_tune_ok;
>> +
>> +	if (td->tune_around == 11) {
>> +		if ((td->valid_front + td->valid_window) >
>> +						td->valid_window_max) {
>> +			if (td->valid_front > td->valid_window)
>> +				td->tune_result = ((td->valid_front -
>> +						td->valid_window) >> 1);
>> +			else
>> +				td->tune_result = td->tune_low +
>> +				((td->valid_window + td->valid_front) >> 1);
>> +		} else {
>> +			td->tune_result = td->tune_low_max +
>> +					(td->valid_window_max >> 1);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (td->tune_result > 0x0b)
>> +			td->tune_result = 0x0b;
>> +
>> +		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
>> +		val &= ~0x1f;
>> +		val |= (0x10800 | (td->tune_result << 1));
>> +		pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_enable_manual_tuning(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
>> +	unsigned int val;
>> +
>> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, &val);
>> +	val &= 0xffffffcf;
>> +	val |= 0x30;
>> +	pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, val);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>> +{
>> +	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
>> +	struct amd_tuning_descriptor *td = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
>> +	u8 ctrl;
>> +
>> +	amd_tuning_reset(host);
>> +	memset(td, 0, sizeof(struct amd_tuning_descriptor));
> 
> I didn't notice last time that you are always clearing all the values in the
> tuning descriptor, so it doesn't need to be kept between calls to
> amd_execute_tuning().  So it should be a local variable that you pass to the
> functions that need it.  Then you don't need the patch I sent at all.
> 
> Does that make sense?
> 

Hi Adrian,

Thanks for pointing this out. Your patch will help, so will remove the memset()
and redo the submission. Is this OK ?

Thanks,
Shyam

>> +
>> +	/*********************************************************************/
>> +	/* Enabling Software Tuning */
>> +	/********************************************************************/
>> +	/* 1. First switch the eMMC to HS200 Mode
>> +	 * 2. Prepare the registers by using the sampling clock select
>> +	 * 3. Send the CMD21 12 times with block length of 64 bytes
>> +	 * 4. Everytime change the clk phase and check for CRC error
>> +	 *	(CMD and DATA),if error, soft reset the CMD and DATA line
>> +	 * 5. Calculate the window and set the clock phase.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	for (td->tune_around = 0; td->tune_around < 12; td->tune_around++) {
>> +		amd_config_tuning_phase(host, td->tune_around);
>> +
>> +		if (mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL)) {
>> +			td->this_tune_ok = false;
>> +			host->mmc->need_retune = 0;
>> +			mdelay(4);
>> +			ctrl = SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA;
>> +			sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET);
>> +		} else {
>> +			td->this_tune_ok = true;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		amd_find_good_phase(host);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	host->mmc->retune_period = 0;
>> +
>> +	amd_enable_manual_tuning(slot);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>  {
>>  	struct pci_dev	*smbus_dev;
>> @@ -841,7 +1006,6 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>
>>  	if ((gen == AMD_CHIPSET_BEFORE_ML) || (gen == AMD_CHIPSET_CZ)) {
>>  		chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLEAR_TRANSFERMODE_REG_BEFORE_CMD;
>> -		chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	return 0;
>> @@ -849,6 +1013,7 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>
>>  static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_amd = {
>>  	.probe		= amd_probe,
>> +	.ops		= &amd_sdhci_pci_ops,
>>  };
>>
>>  static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] = {
>> @@ -1469,6 +1634,17 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
>>  	.select_drive_strength	= sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength,
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct sdhci_ops amd_sdhci_pci_ops = {
>> +	.set_clock	= sdhci_set_clock,
>> +	.enable_dma	= sdhci_pci_enable_dma,
>> +	.set_bus_width	= sdhci_pci_set_bus_width,
>> +	.reset		= sdhci_reset,
>> +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>> +	.hw_reset		= sdhci_pci_hw_reset,
>> +	.select_drive_strength	= sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength,
>> +	.platform_execute_tuning = amd_execute_tuning,
>> +};
>> +
>>  /*****************************************************************************\
>>   *                                                                           *
>>   * Suspend/resume                                                            *
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-14  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-10 12:51 [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD, eMMC-4.5.1 Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-11 12:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-14  6:38   ` Shyam Sundar S K [this message]
2016-11-14 13:37     ` Adrian Hunter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-15  6:57 [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1 Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-16 12:01 ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbebff7a-d144-9dc5-6e59-3a39274ee21d@amd.com \
    --to=ssundark@amd.com \
    --cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
    --cc=Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com \
    --cc=Pankaj.Sen@amd.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.