From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] selftests: bpf: crypto skcipher algo selftests
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:28:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbee6a35-0f6c-4125-a1b9-ff8ad3370fe5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231202010604.1877561-3-vadfed@meta.com>
On 12/1/23 5:06 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Add simple tc hook selftests to show the way to work with new crypto
> BPF API. Some weird structre and map are added to setup program to make
> verifier happy about dynptr initialization from memory. Simple AES-ECB
> algo is used to demonstrate encryption and decryption of fixed size
> buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
> ---
> v6 -> v7:
> - style issues
> v5 -> v6:
> - use AF_ALG socket to confirm proper algorithm test
> - adjust test kernel config to include AF_ALG
> v4 -> v5:
> - adjust selftests to use new naming
> - restore tests on aarch64 and s390 as no sg lists are used
> v3 -> v4:
> - adjust selftests to use new syntax of helpers
> - add tests for acquire and release
> v2 -> v3:
> - disable tests on s390 and aarch64 because of unknown Fatal exception
> in sg_init_one
> v1 -> v2:
> - add CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES and CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB to selftest build config
> suggested by Daniel
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 5 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c | 215 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h | 67 ++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_sanity.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 479 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_common.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_sanity.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> index c125c441abc7..2221994a36d6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> @@ -13,7 +13,12 @@ CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
> CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_HASH=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_SKCIPHER=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SKCIPHER=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB=y
> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4=y
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2dd73cb248be
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +#include <net/if.h>
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/if_alg.h>
> +
> +#include "test_progs.h"
> +#include "network_helpers.h"
> +#include "crypto_sanity.skel.h"
> +
> +#define NS_TEST "crypto_sanity_ns"
> +#define IPV6_IFACE_ADDR "face::1"
> +#define UDP_TEST_PORT 7777
> +static const unsigned char crypto_key[] = "testtest12345678";
> +static const char plain_text[] = "stringtoencrypt0";
> +static int opfd, tfmfd;
nit. init to -1 and test for -1.
> +
> +int init_afalg(void)
static
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_alg sa = {
> + .salg_family = AF_ALG,
> + .salg_type = "skcipher",
> + .salg_name = "ecb(aes)"
> + };
> +
> + tfmfd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> + if (tfmfd == -1)
> + return errno;
> + if (bind(tfmfd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa)) == -1)
> + return errno;
> + if (setsockopt(tfmfd, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, crypto_key, 16) == -1)
> + return errno;
> + opfd = accept(tfmfd, NULL, 0);
> + if (opfd == -1)
> + return errno;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void deinit_afalg(void)
static
> +{
> + if (tfmfd)
> + close(tfmfd);
> + if (opfd)
> + close(opfd);
> +}
> +
> +void do_crypt_afalg(const void *src, void *dst, int size, bool encrypt)
static
> +{
> + struct msghdr msg = {};
> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
> + char cbuf[CMSG_SPACE(4)] = {0};
> + struct iovec iov;
> +
> + msg.msg_control = cbuf;
> + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cbuf);
> +
> + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
> + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_ALG;
> + cmsg->cmsg_type = ALG_SET_OP;
> + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(4);
> + *(__u32 *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg) = encrypt ? ALG_OP_ENCRYPT : ALG_OP_DECRYPT;
> +
> + iov.iov_base = (char *)src;
> + iov.iov_len = size;
> +
> + msg.msg_iov = &iov;
> + msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
> +
> + sendmsg(opfd, &msg, 0);
> + read(opfd, dst, size);
> +}
> +
> +void test_crypto_sanity(void)
> +{
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, qdisc_hook, .attach_point = BPF_TC_EGRESS);
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, tc_attach_enc);
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, tc_attach_dec);
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
> + .repeat = 1,
> + );
> + struct nstoken *nstoken = NULL;
> + struct crypto_sanity *skel;
> + char afalg_plain[16] = {0};
> + char afalg_dst[16] = {0};
> + struct sockaddr_in6 addr;
> + int sockfd, err, pfd;
> + socklen_t addrlen;
> +
> + skel = crypto_sanity__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel open"))
> + return;
> +
> + bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.crypto_accuire, true);
> +
> + err = crypto_sanity__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "crypto_accuire unexpected load success"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + crypto_sanity__destroy(skel);
> +
> + skel = crypto_sanity__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel open"))
> + return;
> +
> + bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.crypto_accuire, false);
Is it needed?
> +
> + SYS(fail, "ip netns add %s", NS_TEST);
> + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s -6 addr add %s/128 dev lo nodad", NS_TEST, IPV6_IFACE_ADDR);
> + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev lo up", NS_TEST);
> +
> + err = crypto_sanity__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "crypto_sanity__load"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + nstoken = open_netns(NS_TEST);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "open_netns"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + err = init_afalg();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "AF_ALG init fail"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + qdisc_hook.ifindex = if_nametoindex("lo");
> + if (!ASSERT_GT(qdisc_hook.ifindex, 0, "if_nametoindex lo"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + err = crypto_sanity__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "crypto_sanity__attach"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + pfd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.crypto_release);
> + if (!ASSERT_GT(pfd, 0, "crypto_release fd"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(pfd, &opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "crypto_release") ||
> + !ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "crypto_release retval"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + pfd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.skb_crypto_setup);
> + if (!ASSERT_GT(pfd, 0, "skb_crypto_setup fd"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(pfd, &opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skb_crypto_setup") ||
> + !ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "skb_crypto_setup retval"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->status, "skb_crypto_setup status"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + err = bpf_tc_hook_create(&qdisc_hook);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create qdisc hook"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + addrlen = sizeof(addr);
> + err = make_sockaddr(AF_INET6, IPV6_IFACE_ADDR, UDP_TEST_PORT,
> + (void *)&addr, &addrlen);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "make_sockaddr"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + tc_attach_enc.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.encrypt_sanity);
> + err = bpf_tc_attach(&qdisc_hook, &tc_attach_enc);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach encrypt filter"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + sockfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(sockfd, -1, "encrypt socket"))
> + goto fail;
> + err = sendto(sockfd, plain_text, 16, 0, (void *)&addr, addrlen);
> + close(sockfd);
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 16, "encrypt send"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + do_crypt_afalg(plain_text, afalg_dst, 16, true);
> +
> + bpf_tc_detach(&qdisc_hook, &tc_attach_enc);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->status, "encrypt status"))
> + goto fail;
> + if (!ASSERT_STRNEQ(skel->bss->dst, afalg_dst, sizeof(afalg_dst), "encrypt AF_ALG"))
nit. Please replace all numeric value "16" usages in this patch with sizeof() or
a macro.
> + goto fail;
> +
> + tc_attach_dec.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.decrypt_sanity);
> + err = bpf_tc_attach(&qdisc_hook, &tc_attach_dec);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach decrypt filter"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + sockfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(sockfd, -1, "decrypt socket"))
> + goto fail;
> + err = sendto(sockfd, afalg_dst, 16, 0, (void *)&addr, addrlen);
> + close(sockfd);
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 16, "decrypt send"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> + do_crypt_afalg(afalg_dst, afalg_plain, 16, false);
> +
> + bpf_tc_detach(&qdisc_hook, &tc_attach_dec);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->status, "decrypt status"))
> + goto fail;
> + if (!ASSERT_STRNEQ(skel->bss->dst, afalg_plain, sizeof(afalg_plain), "decrypt AF_ALG"))
> + goto fail;
> +
> +fail:
> + if (nstoken) {
> + bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&qdisc_hook);
> + close_netns(nstoken);
> + }
> + deinit_afalg();
> + SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " NS_TEST " &> /dev/null");
> + crypto_sanity__destroy(skel);
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_sanity.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_sanity.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f566ff189b7e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/crypto_sanity.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> +#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
> +#include "crypto_common.h"
> +
> +#define UDP_TEST_PORT 7777
> +unsigned char crypto_key[16] = "testtest12345678";
nit. Initialize the crypto_key from the prog_tests/crypto_sanity.c through
skel->bss->crypto_key.
> +char dst[32] = {};
Please add comment on why 32 is needed instead of 16.
> +int status;
> +
> +static int skb_dynptr_validate(struct __sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_dynptr *psrc)
> +{
> + struct ipv6hdr ip6h;
> + struct udphdr udph;
> + u32 offset;
> +
> + if (skb->protocol != __bpf_constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (bpf_skb_load_bytes(skb, ETH_HLEN, &ip6h, sizeof(ip6h)))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (ip6h.nexthdr != IPPROTO_UDP)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (bpf_skb_load_bytes(skb, ETH_HLEN + sizeof(ip6h), &udph, sizeof(udph)))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (udph.dest != __bpf_constant_htons(UDP_TEST_PORT))
> + return -1;
> +
> + offset = ETH_HLEN + sizeof(ip6h) + sizeof(udph);
> + if (skb->len < offset + 16)
> + return -1;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, psrc);
> + bpf_dynptr_adjust(psrc, offset, offset + 16);
The bpf_crypto_(de|en)crypt kfunc requires the 16 bytes to be in the linear area
of psrc, so it is better to do a bpf_skb_pull_data() if it is not in the linear
area. People will directly borrow the code from here.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1")
> +int BPF_PROG(skb_crypto_setup)
> +{
> + struct bpf_crypto_ctx *cctx;
> + struct bpf_dynptr key = {};
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + status = 0;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(crypto_key, sizeof(crypto_key), 0, &key);
> + cctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create("skcipher", "ecb(aes)", &key, 0, &err);
> +
> + if (!cctx) {
> + status = err;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + err = crypto_ctx_insert(cctx);
> + if (err && err != -EEXIST)
> + status = err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1")
> +int BPF_PROG(crypto_release)
> +{
> + struct bpf_crypto_ctx *cctx;
> + struct bpf_dynptr key = {};
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + status = 0;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(crypto_key, sizeof(crypto_key), 0, &key);
> + cctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create("skcipher", "ecb(aes)", &key, 0, &err);
> +
> + if (!cctx) {
> + status = err;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + bpf_crypto_ctx_release(cctx);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("?fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1")
> +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
> +int BPF_PROG(crypto_accuire)
Does it mean to be s/accuire/acquire/ ?
> +{
> + struct bpf_crypto_ctx *cctx;
> + struct bpf_dynptr key = {};
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + status = 0;
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(crypto_key, sizeof(crypto_key), 0, &key);
> + cctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_create("skcipher", "ecb(aes)", &key, 0, &err);
> +
> + if (!cctx) {
> + status = err;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + cctx = bpf_crypto_ctx_acquire(cctx);
> + if (!cctx)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + bpf_crypto_ctx_release(cctx);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("tc")
> +int decrypt_sanity(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct __crypto_ctx_value *v;
> + struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx;
> + struct bpf_dynptr psrc, pdst, iv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = skb_dynptr_validate(skb, &psrc);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + status = err;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + v = crypto_ctx_value_lookup();
> + if (!v) {
> + status = -ENOENT;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + ctx = v->ctx;
> + if (!ctx) {
> + status = -ENOENT;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dst, sizeof(dst), 0, &pdst);
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dst, 0, 0, &iv);
This is quite non-intutive to say iv is not needed. A better user experience is
to allow passing NULL to the kfunc. This probably could be improved in the
future without breaking the kfunc api. Please add a comment here.
> +
> + status = bpf_crypto_decrypt(ctx, &psrc, &pdst, &iv);
> +
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("tc")
> +int encrypt_sanity(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct __crypto_ctx_value *v;
> + struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx;
> + struct bpf_dynptr psrc, pdst, iv;
> + int err;
> +
> + status = 0;
> +
> + err = skb_dynptr_validate(skb, &psrc);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + status = err;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + v = crypto_ctx_value_lookup();
> + if (!v) {
> + status = -ENOENT;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + ctx = v->ctx;
> + if (!ctx) {
> + status = -ENOENT;
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> + }
> +
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dst, sizeof(dst), 0, &pdst);
> + bpf_dynptr_from_mem(dst, 0, 0, &iv);
> +
> + status = bpf_crypto_encrypt(ctx, &psrc, &pdst, &iv);
> +
> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> +}
> +
> +char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-02 1:06 [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: make common crypto API for TC/XDP programs Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-02 1:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/3] bpf: crypto: add skcipher to bpf crypto Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-02 3:52 ` Herbert Xu
2023-12-03 20:00 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-02 1:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] selftests: bpf: crypto skcipher algo selftests Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-03 10:59 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-03 18:43 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-05 1:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-12-02 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: make common crypto API for TC/XDP programs Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-03 19:02 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-04 23:08 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-03 10:57 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-03 19:08 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-12-05 20:19 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-05 21:15 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-06 5:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-12-07 12:14 ` Vadim Fedorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbee6a35-0f6c-4125-a1b9-ff8ad3370fe5@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadfed@meta.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.