All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] DM brokeness with NOWAIT
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 21:13:23 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbee74a-cb51-ad2-7cad-4ac67488c84@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZQSoWU78md88xFgB@redhat.com>



On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Mike Snitzer wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 12:14P -0400,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
> > On 9/15/23 10:04 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Threw some db traffic into my testing mix, and that ended in tears
> > > very quickly:
> > > 
> > > CPU: 7 PID: 49609 Comm: ringbuf-read.t Tainted: G        W          6.6.0-rc1-g39956d2dcd81 #129
> > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  <TASK>
> > >  dump_stack_lvl+0x11d/0x1b0
> > >  __might_resched+0x3c3/0x5e0
> > >  ? preempt_count_sub+0x150/0x150
> > >  mempool_alloc+0x1e2/0x390
> > >  ? sanity_check_pinned_pages+0x23/0x1010
> > >  ? mempool_resize+0x7d0/0x7d0
> > >  bio_alloc_bioset+0x417/0x8c0
> > >  ? bvec_alloc+0x200/0x200
> > >  ? __gup_device_huge+0x900/0x900
> > >  bio_alloc_clone+0x53/0x100
> > >  dm_submit_bio+0x27f/0x1a20
> > >  ? lock_release+0x4b7/0x670
> > >  ? pin_user_pages_fast+0xb6/0xf0
> > >  ? blk_try_enter_queue+0x1a0/0x4d0
> > >  ? dm_dax_direct_access+0x260/0x260
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? blk_try_enter_queue+0x1cc/0x4d0
> > >  __submit_bio+0x239/0x310
> > >  ? __bio_queue_enter+0x700/0x700
> > >  ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x40/0x60
> > >  ? ktime_get+0x285/0x470
> > >  submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d9/0xb80
> > >  ? should_fail_request+0x80/0x80
> > >  ? preempt_count_sub+0x150/0x150
> > >  ? folio_flags+0x6c/0x1e0
> > >  submit_bio_noacct+0x53e/0x1b30
> > >  blkdev_direct_IO.part.0+0x833/0x1810
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? lock_release+0x4b7/0x670
> > >  ? blkdev_read_iter+0x40d/0x530
> > >  ? reacquire_held_locks+0x4e0/0x4e0
> > >  ? __blkdev_direct_IO_simple+0x780/0x780
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x297/0xd50
> > >  ? preempt_count_add+0x72/0x140
> > >  blkdev_read_iter+0x2a4/0x530
> > >  ? blkdev_write_iter+0xc40/0xc40
> > >  io_read+0x369/0x1490
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? io_writev_prep_async+0x260/0x260
> > >  ? __fget_files+0x279/0x410
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  io_issue_sqe+0x18a/0xd90
> > >  io_submit_sqes+0x970/0x1ed0
> > >  __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x14d4/0x2650
> > >  ? io_submit_sqes+0x1ed0/0x1ed0
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? __do_sys_io_uring_register+0x3f6/0x2190
> > >  ? io_req_caches_free+0x500/0x500
> > >  ? ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x85/0x5b0
> > >  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
> > >  ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xd0/0x100
> > >  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > > 
> > > which seems to demonstrate a misunderstanding on what REQ_NOWAIT is
> > > about. In particulary, it seems to assume you can then submit with
> > > atomic context? DM does an rcu_read_lock() and happily proceeds to
> > > attempt to submit IO under RCU being disabled.
> > 
> > Did a quick check to see where this came from, and it got added with:
> > 
> > commit 563a225c9fd207326c2a2af9d59b4097cb31ce70
> > Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> > Date:   Sat Mar 26 21:08:36 2022 -0400
> > 
> >     dm: introduce dm_{get,put}_live_table_bio called from dm_submit_bio
> > 
> > which conspiciously doesn't include any numbers on why this is necessary
> > or a good thing, and notably probably wasn't tested? This landed in 5.19
> > fwiw.
> 
> Don't recall what I was thinking, and I clearly didn't properly test
> either... should've consulted Mikulas.  Sorry for the trouble.
> 
> Would you like to send a formal patch with your Signed-off-by and I'll
> mark it for stable@ and get it to Linus?
> 
> Mike

We could revert that commit or we could change the all the remaining 
GFP_NOIOs in drivers/md/dm.c to "bio_opf & REQ_NOWAIT ? GFP_NOWAIT : 
GFP_NOIO". I'm not sure which one of these possibilities is better.

Converting GFP_NOIOs would complicate dm.c a bit, but it would make sure 
that requests with REQ_NOWAIT don't really sleep. What do you think?

Mikulas
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-15 16:04 [dm-devel] DM brokeness with NOWAIT Jens Axboe
2023-09-15 16:14 ` Jens Axboe
2023-09-15 18:54   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-09-15 19:00     ` Jens Axboe
2023-09-15 19:13     ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2023-09-15 19:16       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbee74a-cb51-ad2-7cad-4ac67488c84@redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.