From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Merging ppc32 and ppc64
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:30:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc3d7701e701266ffe852acf4da127ed@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508091510400.28068@numbat.sonytel.be>
>>>> I don't see the merge as changing the actual code that gets executed
>>>> on any given platform very much, except in one respect: we are going
>>>> to standardize on a flattened device tree as the way that
>>>> information
>>>> about the platform gets passed from the boot loader to the kernel.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^***********^^^^^^^^******^
Yes, and that is exactly what I do not want. We are not going
to require OF implementations that do not need yaboot or similar
to pass a flattened device tree to the kernel, eh? Also, there
is no reason why something like yaboot (with an OF still running
underneath) should have to care about anything device-tree related
at all; the OS can just as easily ask the OF itself.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-03 3:07 Merging ppc32 and ppc64 Paul Mackerras
2005-08-03 5:48 ` Fwd: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-08 17:59 ` Joel Schopp
2005-08-08 23:48 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 13:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 13:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-08-09 13:30 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2005-08-09 14:12 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-08-09 15:01 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 16:21 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 17:41 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-09 18:49 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 15:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 22:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-09 23:00 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-10 10:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-08-09 14:52 ` Olof Johansson
2005-08-09 22:48 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-10 10:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-04 2:37 Goodman, Brad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc3d7701e701266ffe852acf4da127ed@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.