From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
zhengjun.xing@intel.com
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [mm/gup] a308c71bf1: stress-ng.vm-splice.ops_per_sec -95.6% regression
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:28:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd22f78e-764b-4896-e2d0-5f4e4cf178af@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiRnRsS4CqLypK533G2Ho=NVTt_s-e9KXZ=b0ptOSB15A@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/5/2020 2:29 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 1:15 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -95.6% regression of stress-ng.vm-splice.ops_per_sec due to commit:
>>
>> commit: a308c71bf1e6e19cc2e4ced31853ee0fc7cb439a ("mm/gup: Remove enfornced COW mechanism")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> Note that this is just the reverse of the previous 2000% improvement
> reported by the test robot here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200611040453.GK12456@shao2-debian/
>
> and the explanation seems to remain the same:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez1v1b4X5LgFya6nvi33-TWwqna_dc5jGFVosqQhdn_Nkg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> IOW, this is testing a special case (zero page lookup) that the "force
> COW" patches happened to turn into a regular case (COW creating a
> regular page from the zero page).
>
> The question is whether we should care about the zero page for gup_fast lookup.
>
> If we do care, then the proper fix is likely simply to allow the zero
> page in fast-gup, the same way we already do in slow-gup.
>
> ENTIRELY UNTESTED PATCH ATTACHED.
>
> Rong - mind testing this? I don't think the zero-page _should_ be
> something that real loads care about, but hey, maybe people do want to
> do things like splice zeroes very efficiently..
I test the patch, the regression still existed.
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/nr_threads/disk/testtime/class/cpufreq_governor/ucode:
lkp-csl-2sp5/stress-ng/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/100%/1HDD/30s/pipe/performance/0x5002f01
commit:
1a0cf26323c80e2f1c58fc04f15686de61bfab0c
a308c71bf1e6e19cc2e4ced31853ee0fc7cb439a
da5ba9980aa2211c1e2a89fc814abab2fea6f69d (debug patch)
1a0cf26323c80e2f a308c71bf1e6e19cc2e4ced3185 da5ba9980aa2211c1e2a89fc814
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
3.406e+09 -95.6% 1.49e+08 -96.4% 1.213e+08
stress-ng.vm-splice.ops
1.135e+08 -95.6% 4965911 -96.4% 4041777
stress-ng.vm-splice.ops_per_sec
>
> And note the "untested" part of the patch. It _looks_ fairly obvious,
> but maybe I'm missing something.
>
> Linus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org
>
--
Zhengjun Xing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 9:14 [mm/gup] a308c71bf1: stress-ng.vm-splice.ops_per_sec -95.6% regression kernel test robot
2020-11-04 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-05 8:28 ` Xing Zhengjun [this message]
2020-11-05 18:37 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-11-06 5:12 ` Xing Zhengjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd22f78e-764b-4896-e2d0-5f4e4cf178af@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.