From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A547081A; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782078641; cv=none; b=QASuKdzhkz8KATc9uMps3sEgHIPcXlkHi4G74fId2ECOIjjTXzUWUNIjkuYH1e2C7ry29lv+5sCS2MBIGsSmXa5nMiwdg5xyEF+2oZX73OFgy275wVUC0f0D6/C061Iv2jSA/2WRzOpSdBGgDd8Tjuf5FPUoTtZ+O2Wv7/e8U/Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782078641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/fJJkX/+8BvvzZo1p1vaUpSBU3H3Yn1TAUuW/XVtoHs=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Vi1fwUwPAwYlPTkP+KxX9zZXQmd6i2IO3OA8kqE8h3VCICS1oqCeuYVToeWnCb2wS+CWc38Zl/xvn2pi/LvRJ7GHIfLV01ax3VoOEY8smIVGvKosDVECtg5cA8clAFhGsaomjxnu0VKJr417vF6YhS1lD1KJsJQeYKS4mjMhwjs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=m9GyS3KQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="m9GyS3KQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782078640; x=1813614640; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=/fJJkX/+8BvvzZo1p1vaUpSBU3H3Yn1TAUuW/XVtoHs=; b=m9GyS3KQT+yla93SGrOEm+zXOmI3G6PBFLAGQWUM4SBO0XnjJkU4nFbo y0BFXF5ekhj9xneK05KOqnyvqaRiflqaV4idmdLYbKMqWrZvcOA8Gr2bT 9gfzdK9/FU+PmlEv/dnjwgrkZ7KDZeUrpXDN3FX/Lh2+GiBksBy8tz6Rs CgX5/1NJHQgjrDLycSlKBL6oyqxHyRrFFONKIZOzW1dh5Cp60lBTLcimp keBtP/4FYS8hiSUVyeNmMMJ/h233qymTxTXEvc9hA9kt/xHK8GeeCqAPJ V2TOAgAp2FBPgJypquR84fo4b2AZ46jkNXQ6WJtj/v13Pm0EO8kkrpulV Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SQMtNUGRRfiWYg+wKbMSAw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: II5Z1FI2S7itlV0mHxcJrA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11824"; a="82683324" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,217,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="82683324" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2026 14:50:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wuAlyXjpSj2bUCWne90h9Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: a9KqFL1OQFSe6BX+GZt0VA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,217,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="249122701" Received: from spandruv-desk.jf.intel.com ([10.54.55.20]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2026 14:50:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set cpuinfo_min_freq to a lower value with HWP enabled plus cleanups From: srinivas pandruvada To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM Cc: LKML Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 14:50:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6005456.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <6005456.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2026-06-19 at 19:31 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, >=20 > This is in v2 because technically it is an update of >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2381464.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki/ >=20 > but it contains new patches. >=20 > This series updates the intel_pstate driver to set cpuinfo_min_freq > to a lower > value when HWP is enabled to support systems in which CPUs can > actually run > at performance levels below the current minimum level. >=20 Is this intentional? HWP_CAP: 0x10f163e MSR 0xce(platform_info: 0x804043df8811b00 cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq 100000 cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq 400000 Thanks, Srinivas > It also carries out some code cleanups, mostly related to HWP, either > in > preparation for the functional changes or top of them. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 >=20 >=20