All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <amery.hung@bytedance.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us, stfomichev@gmail.com,
	ekarani.silvestre@ccc.ufcg.edu.br, yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, yepeilin.cs@gmail.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/13] selftests/bpf: Test referenced kptr arguments of struct_ops programs
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:40:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd5e82d1-d00a-4bda-be4b-802204167352@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241213232958.2388301-3-amery.hung@bytedance.com>




On 12/13/24 3:29 PM, Amery Hung wrote:
> Test referenced kptr acquired through struct_ops argument tagged with
> "__ref". The success case checks whether 1) a reference to the correct
> type is acquired, and 2) the referenced kptr argument can be accessed in
> multiple paths as long as it hasn't been released. In the fail cases,
> we first confirm that a referenced kptr acquried through a struct_ops
> argument is not allowed to be leaked. Then, we make sure this new
> referenced kptr acquiring mechanism does not accidentally allow referenced
> kptrs to flow into global subprograms through their arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <amery.hung@bytedance.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  7 ++
>   .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  2 +
>   .../prog_tests/test_struct_ops_refcounted.c   | 58 ++++++++++++++++
>   .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted.c         | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
>   ...ruct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.c | 32 +++++++++
>   .../struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.c    | 17 +++++
>   6 files changed, 183 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_refcounted.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> index 987d41af71d2..244234546ae2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -1135,10 +1135,17 @@ static int bpf_testmod_ops__test_maybe_null(int dummy,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int bpf_testmod_ops__test_refcounted(int dummy,
> +					    struct task_struct *task__ref)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static struct bpf_testmod_ops __bpf_testmod_ops = {
>   	.test_1 = bpf_testmod_test_1,
>   	.test_2 = bpf_testmod_test_2,
>   	.test_maybe_null = bpf_testmod_ops__test_maybe_null,
> +	.test_refcounted = bpf_testmod_ops__test_refcounted,
>   };
>   
>   struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_testmod_ops = {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
> index fb7dff47597a..0e31586c1353 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops {
>   	/* Used to test nullable arguments. */
>   	int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
>   	int (*unsupported_ops)(void);
> +	/* Used to test ref_acquired arguments. */
> +	int (*test_refcounted)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task);
>   
>   	/* The following fields are used to test shadow copies. */
>   	char onebyte;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_refcounted.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_refcounted.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..976df951b700
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_refcounted.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +
> +#include "struct_ops_refcounted.skel.h"
> +#include "struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.skel.h"
> +#include "struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.skel.h"
> +
> +/* Test that the verifier accepts a program that first acquires a referenced
> + * kptr through context and then releases the reference
> + */
> +static void refcounted(void)
> +{
> +	struct struct_ops_refcounted *skel;
> +
> +	skel = struct_ops_refcounted__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	struct_ops_refcounted__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test that the verifier rejects a program that acquires a referenced
> + * kptr through context without releasing the reference
> + */
> +static void refcounted_fail__ref_leak(void)
> +{
> +	struct struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak *skel;
> +
> +	skel = struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak__open_and_load();
> +	if (ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_fail__open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test that the verifier rejects a program that contains a global
> + * subprogram with referenced kptr arguments
> + */
> +static void refcounted_fail__global_subprog(void)
> +{
> +	struct struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog *skel;
> +
> +	skel = struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog__open_and_load();
> +	if (ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_fail__open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +void test_struct_ops_refcounted(void)
> +{
> +	if (test__start_subtest("refcounted"))
> +		refcounted();
> +	if (test__start_subtest("refcounted_fail__ref_leak"))
> +		refcounted_fail__ref_leak();
> +	if (test__start_subtest("refcounted_fail__global_subprog"))
> +		refcounted_fail__global_subprog();
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2c1326668b92
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
> +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +extern void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
> +
> +/* This is a test BPF program that uses struct_ops to access a referenced
> + * kptr argument. This is a test for the verifier to ensure that it
> + * 1) recongnizes the task as a referenced object (i.e., ref_obj_id > 0), and
> + * 2) the same reference can be acquired from multiple paths as long as it
> + *    has not been released.
> + *
> + * test_refcounted() is equivalent to the C code below. It is written in assembly
> + * to avoid reads from task (i.e., getting referenced kptrs to task) being merged
> + * into single path by the compiler.
> + *
> + * int test_refcounted(int dummy, struct task_struct *task)
> + * {
> + *         if (dummy % 2)
> + *                 bpf_task_release(task);
> + *         else
> + *                 bpf_task_release(task);
> + *         return 0;
> + * }
> + */
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_refcounted")
> +int test_refcounted(unsigned long long *ctx)
> +{
> +	asm volatile ("					\
> +	/* r6 = dummy */				\
> +	r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0);			\
> +	/* if (r6 & 0x1 != 0) */			\
> +	r6 &= 0x1;					\
> +	if r6 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
> +	/* r1 = task */					\
> +	r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x8);			\
> +	call %[bpf_task_release];			\
> +	goto l1_%=;					\
> +l0_%=:	/* r1 = task */					\
> +	r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x8);			\
> +	call %[bpf_task_release];			\
> +l1_%=:	/* return 0 */					\
> +"	:
> +	: __imm(bpf_task_release)
> +	: __clobber_all);
> +	return 0;
> +}

You can use clang nomerge attribute to prevent bpf_task_release(task) merging. For example,

$ cat t.c
struct task_struct {
         int a;
         int b;
         int d[20];
};


__attribute__((nomerge)) extern void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *task);

int test_refcounted(int dummy, struct task_struct *task)
{
         if (dummy % 2)
                 bpf_task_release(task);
         else
                 bpf_task_release(task);
         return 0;
}

$ clang --version
clang version 19.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ab4b5a2db582958af1ee308a790cfdb42bd24720)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /home/yhs/work/llvm-project/llvm/build.19/Release/bin
$ clang --target=bpf -O2 -mcpu=v3 -S t.c
$ cat t.s
         .text
         .file   "t.c"
         .globl  test_refcounted                 # -- Begin function test_refcounted
         .p2align        3
         .type   test_refcounted,@function
test_refcounted:                        # @test_refcounted
# %bb.0:
         w1 &= 1
         if w1 == 0 goto LBB0_2
# %bb.1:
         r1 = r2
         call bpf_task_release
         goto LBB0_3
LBB0_2:
         r1 = r2
         call bpf_task_release
LBB0_3:
         w0 = 0
         exit
.Lfunc_end0:
         .size   test_refcounted, .Lfunc_end0-test_refcounted
                                         # -- End function
         .addrsig

> +
> +/* BTF FUNC records are not generated for kfuncs referenced
> + * from inline assembly. These records are necessary for
> + * libbpf to link the program. The function below is a hack
> + * to ensure that BTF FUNC records are generated.
> + */
> +void __btf_root(void)
> +{
> +	bpf_task_release(NULL);
> +}
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_refcounted = {
> +	.test_refcounted = (void *)test_refcounted,
> +};
> +
> +
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c7e84e63b053
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__global_subprog.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +extern void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
> +
> +__noinline int subprog_release(__u64 *ctx __arg_ctx)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *task = (struct task_struct *)ctx[1];
> +	int dummy = (int)ctx[0];
> +
> +	bpf_task_release(task);
> +
> +	return dummy + 1;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_refcounted")
> +int test_refcounted(unsigned long long *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *task = (struct task_struct *)ctx[1];
> +
> +	bpf_task_release(task);
> +
> +	return subprog_release(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_ref_acquire = {
> +	.test_refcounted = (void *)test_refcounted,
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e82859eb187
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_refcounted_fail__ref_leak.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h"
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_refcounted")
> +int BPF_PROG(test_refcounted, int dummy,
> +	     struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_ref_acquire = {
> +	.test_refcounted = (void *)test_refcounted,
> +};


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-19  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13 23:29 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/13] bpf qdisc Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/13] bpf: Support getting referenced kptr from struct_ops argument Amery Hung
2024-12-18  0:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-18  1:24     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-18 16:09       ` Amery Hung
2024-12-18 17:20         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-18  1:44     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-18 16:57     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-19 23:06       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/13] selftests/bpf: Test referenced kptr arguments of struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-12-18  1:17   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-18 16:10     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-19  3:40   ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-12-19 20:49     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/13] bpf: Allow struct_ops prog to return referenced kptr Amery Hung
2024-12-18 22:29   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/13] selftests/bpf: Test returning referenced kptr from struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/13] bpf: net_sched: Support implementation of Qdisc_ops in bpf Amery Hung
2024-12-14  4:51   ` Cong Wang
2024-12-18 23:37   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/13] bpf: net_sched: Add basic bpf qdisc kfuncs Amery Hung
2024-12-18 17:11   ` Amery Hung
2024-12-19  7:37   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-20  0:32     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/13] bpf: net_sched: Add a qdisc watchdog timer Amery Hung
2024-12-19  1:16   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-12-20 19:24     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/13] bpf: net_sched: Support updating bstats Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/13] bpf: net_sched: Support updating qstats Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/13] bpf: net_sched: Allow writing to more Qdisc members Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/13] libbpf: Support creating and destroying qdisc Amery Hung
2024-12-17 18:32   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-12-17 19:08     ` Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/13] selftests: Add a basic fifo qdisc test Amery Hung
2024-12-13 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/13] selftests: Add a bpf fq qdisc to selftest Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd5e82d1-d00a-4bda-be4b-802204167352@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=amery.hung@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ekarani.silvestre@ccc.ufcg.edu.br \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.