From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "Lai, Yi1" <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu/sva: Invalidate KVA range on kernel TLB flush
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:49:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde6d861-daa3-49ed-ad4f-ff9dcaf1f2b8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0f613ce-7aad-4b1d-b6a1-4acc1d6c489e@linux.intel.com>
On 8/26/25 09:25, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 8/26/25 06:36, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 8/22/25 20:26, Baolu Lu wrote:
>>> +static struct {
>>> + /* list for pagetable_dtor_free() */
>>> + struct list_head dtor;
>>> + /* list for __free_page() */
>>> + struct list_head page;
>>> + /* list for free_pages() */
>>> + struct list_head pages;
>>> + /* protect all the ptdesc lists */
>>> + spinlock_t lock;
>>> + struct work_struct work;
>>
>> Could you explain a bit why this now needs three separate lists? Seems
>> like pure overkill.
>
> Yes, sure.
>
> The three separate lists are needed because we're handling three
> distinct types of page deallocation. Grouping the pages this way allows
> the workqueue handler to free each type using the correct function.
Please allow me to add more details.
>
> - pagetable_dtor_free(): This is for freeing PTE pages, which require
> specific cleanup of a ptdesc structure.
This is used in
static inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
and
int pud_free_pmd_page(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr)
>
> - __free_page(): This is for freeing a single page.
This is used in
static void cpa_collapse_large_pages(struct cpa_data *cpa)
{
... ...
list_for_each_entry_safe(ptdesc, tmp, &pgtables, pt_list) {
list_del(&ptdesc->pt_list);
__free_page(ptdesc_page(ptdesc));
}
}
>
> - free_pages(): This is for freeing a contiguous block of pages that
> were allocated together.
This is used in
static void __meminit free_pagetable(struct page *page, int order)
{
... ...
free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
}
What's strange is that order is almost always 0, except in the path of
remove_pmd_table() -> free_hugepage_table(), where order can be greater
than 0. However, in this context path, free_hugepage_table() isn't used
to free a page table page itself. Instead, it's used to free the actual
pages that a leaf PMD is pointing to.
static void __meminit
remove_pmd_table(pmd_t *pmd_start, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
bool direct, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
{
... ...
if (pmd_leaf(*pmd)) {
if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE) &&
IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
if (!direct)
free_hugepage_table(pmd_page(*pmd),
altmap);
spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
pmd_clear(pmd);
spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
pages++;
} else if (vmemmap_pmd_is_unused(addr, next)) {
free_hugepage_table(pmd_page(*pmd),
altmap);
spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
pmd_clear(pmd);
spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
}
continue;
... ...
}
Is this a misuse of free_pagetable() or anything overlooked?
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 5:25 [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu/sva: Invalidate KVA range on kernel TLB flush Lu Baolu
2025-08-06 15:03 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 15:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06 16:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06 16:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 16:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-07 14:40 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-08 5:15 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-10 7:19 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-11 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-11 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-15 9:23 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-11 13:55 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-11 14:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-12 1:17 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-15 14:35 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-11 12:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-13 3:17 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-18 1:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-08 2:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 9:16 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 9:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-18 5:58 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 14:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-18 6:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-18 6:21 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-21 7:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-23 3:26 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-25 22:36 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-26 1:25 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-26 2:49 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-08-26 14:22 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-26 14:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-26 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-27 10:58 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-27 23:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 5:31 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-28 7:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-28 18:56 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 19:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-26 16:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-27 6:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-08 5:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 6:53 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-14 4:48 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-15 7:48 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dde6d861-daa3-49ed-ad4f-ff9dcaf1f2b8@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.